TY - JOUR
T1 - Artificial intelligence for cervical cancer screening
T2 - Scoping review, 2009–2022
AU - Vargas-Cardona, Hernán Darío
AU - Rodriguez-Lopez, Mérida
AU - Arrivillaga, Marcela
AU - Vergara-Sanchez, Carlos
AU - García-Cifuentes, Juan P.
AU - Bermúdez, Paula C.
AU - Jaramillo-Botero, Andres
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
PY - 2024/5
Y1 - 2024/5
N2 - Background: The intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) with cancer research is increasing, and many of the advances have focused on the analysis of cancer images. Objectives: To describe and synthesize the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of AI in early imaging diagnosis of cervical cancer following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Search Strategy: Arksey and O'Malley methodology was used and PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched using a combination of English and Spanish keywords. Selection Criteria: Identified titles and abstracts were screened to select original reports and cross-checked for overlap of cases. Data Collection and Analysis: A descriptive summary was organized by the AI algorithm used, total of images analyzed, data source, clinical comparison criteria, and diagnosis performance. Main Results: We identified 32 studies published between 2009 and 2022. The primary sources of images were digital colposcopy, cervicography, and mobile devices. The machine learning/deep learning (DL) algorithms applied in the articles included support vector machine (SVM), random forest classifier, k-nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, C4.5, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, XGboots, conditional random fields, Bayes classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN; and variations), ResNet (several versions), YOLO+EfficientNetB0, and visual geometry group (VGG; several versions). SVM and DL methods (CNN, ResNet, VGG) showed the best diagnostic performances, with an accuracy of over 97%. Conclusion: We concluded that the use of AI for cervical cancer screening has increased over the years, and some results (mainly from DL) are very promising. However, further research is necessary to validate these findings.
AB - Background: The intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) with cancer research is increasing, and many of the advances have focused on the analysis of cancer images. Objectives: To describe and synthesize the literature on the diagnostic accuracy of AI in early imaging diagnosis of cervical cancer following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Search Strategy: Arksey and O'Malley methodology was used and PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases were searched using a combination of English and Spanish keywords. Selection Criteria: Identified titles and abstracts were screened to select original reports and cross-checked for overlap of cases. Data Collection and Analysis: A descriptive summary was organized by the AI algorithm used, total of images analyzed, data source, clinical comparison criteria, and diagnosis performance. Main Results: We identified 32 studies published between 2009 and 2022. The primary sources of images were digital colposcopy, cervicography, and mobile devices. The machine learning/deep learning (DL) algorithms applied in the articles included support vector machine (SVM), random forest classifier, k-nearest neighbors, multilayer perceptron, C4.5, Naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, XGboots, conditional random fields, Bayes classifier, convolutional neural network (CNN; and variations), ResNet (several versions), YOLO+EfficientNetB0, and visual geometry group (VGG; several versions). SVM and DL methods (CNN, ResNet, VGG) showed the best diagnostic performances, with an accuracy of over 97%. Conclusion: We concluded that the use of AI for cervical cancer screening has increased over the years, and some results (mainly from DL) are very promising. However, further research is necessary to validate these findings.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - cervical cancer
KW - clinical diagnosis
KW - colposcopy
KW - deep learning
KW - machine learning
KW - mass screening
KW - uterine cervical neoplasms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173951375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.15179
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.15179
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37811597
AN - SCOPUS:85173951375
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 165
SP - 566
EP - 578
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 2
ER -