TY - JOUR
T1 - Zero–Average Dynamics Technique Applied to the Buck–Boost Converter
T2 - Results on Periodicity, Bifurcations, and Chaotic Behavior
AU - Patiño, Diego A.Londoño
AU - Trujillo, Simeón Casanova
AU - Hoyos, Fredy E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/4
Y1 - 2025/4
N2 - This study addresses chaos control in a Buck–Boost converter using ZAD technique and FPIC. The system analysis identified 1-periodic orbits and observed the occurrence of flip bifurcations, indicating chaotic behavior characterized by sensitivity to initial conditions. To mitigate these instabilities, FPIC was successfully applied, stabilizing periodic orbits and significantly reducing chaos in the system. Numerical simulations verified the presence of chaos, confirmed by positive Lyapunov exponents, and demonstrated the effectiveness of the applied control methods. Steady-state and transient responses of the open-loop model and experimental system were evaluated, showing a strong correlation between them. Under varying load conditions, the numerical model accurately predicted the converter’s real dynamics, validating the proposed approach. Additionally, closed-loop control with ZAD exhibited robust performance, maintaining stable inductor current even during abrupt load changes, thus achieving effective control in non-minimum phase systems. This work contributes to the design of robust control strategies for power converters, optimizing their stability and dynamic response in applications that require precise management of power under variable conditions. Finally, a comparison was made between the performance of the Buck–Boost converter controlled with ZAD and the one controlled by PID. It was observed that both controllers effectively regulate the current, with a steady-state error of less than 1%. However, the system controlled with ZAD maintains a fixed switching frequency, whereas the PID-controlled system lacks a fixed switching frequency and operates with a very high PWM frequency. This high frequency in the PID-controlled system presents a disadvantage, as it leads to issues such as chattering, duty cycle saturation, and consequently, overheating of the MOSFET.
AB - This study addresses chaos control in a Buck–Boost converter using ZAD technique and FPIC. The system analysis identified 1-periodic orbits and observed the occurrence of flip bifurcations, indicating chaotic behavior characterized by sensitivity to initial conditions. To mitigate these instabilities, FPIC was successfully applied, stabilizing periodic orbits and significantly reducing chaos in the system. Numerical simulations verified the presence of chaos, confirmed by positive Lyapunov exponents, and demonstrated the effectiveness of the applied control methods. Steady-state and transient responses of the open-loop model and experimental system were evaluated, showing a strong correlation between them. Under varying load conditions, the numerical model accurately predicted the converter’s real dynamics, validating the proposed approach. Additionally, closed-loop control with ZAD exhibited robust performance, maintaining stable inductor current even during abrupt load changes, thus achieving effective control in non-minimum phase systems. This work contributes to the design of robust control strategies for power converters, optimizing their stability and dynamic response in applications that require precise management of power under variable conditions. Finally, a comparison was made between the performance of the Buck–Boost converter controlled with ZAD and the one controlled by PID. It was observed that both controllers effectively regulate the current, with a steady-state error of less than 1%. However, the system controlled with ZAD maintains a fixed switching frequency, whereas the PID-controlled system lacks a fixed switching frequency and operates with a very high PWM frequency. This high frequency in the PID-controlled system presents a disadvantage, as it leads to issues such as chattering, duty cycle saturation, and consequently, overheating of the MOSFET.
KW - bifurcations
KW - closed-loop control
KW - dynamic system
KW - load variation response
KW - Lyapunov exponents
KW - power converter
KW - system stability
KW - ZAD technique
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003653888&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/en18082051
DO - 10.3390/en18082051
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003653888
SN - 1996-1073
VL - 18
SP - 1
EP - 35
JO - Energies
JF - Energies
IS - 8
M1 - 2051
ER -