TY - JOUR
T1 - Unsupervised feature extraction techniques for hyperspectral data and its effects on unsupervised classification
AU - Jimenez-Rodriguez, Luis O.
AU - Arzuaga-Cruz, Emmanuel
AU - Vélez-Reyes, Miguel
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Feature extraction, implemented as a linear projection from a higher dimensional space to a lower dimensional subspace, is a very important issue in hyperspectral data analysis. The projection must be done in a matter that minimizes the redundancy, maintaining the information content. In hyperspectral data analysis, a relevant objective of feature extraction is to reduce the dimensionality of the data maintaining the capability of discriminating object of interest from the cluttered background. This paper presents a comparative study of different unsupervised feature extraction mechanisms and shows their effects on unsupervised detection and classification. The mechanisms implemented and compared are an unsupervised SVD based band subset selection mechanism, Projection Pursuit, and Principal Component Analysis. For purposes of validating the unsupervised methods, supervised mechanisms as Discriminant Analysis and a supervised band subset selection using Bhattacharyya distance were implemented and its results were compared with the unsupervised methods. Unsupervised band subset selection based on SVD chooses automatically the most independent set of bands. Projection Pursuit based feature extraction algorithm automatically searches for projections that optimize a projection index. The projection index we optimized is one that measures the information divergence between the probability density function of the projected data and the Gaussian probability density function. This produces a projection where the probability density function of the whole data set is multi-modal, instead of a Gaussian uni-modal distribution. This augments the separability of the unknown clusters in the lower dimensional space. Finally they were compared with well-known and used Principal Component Analysis. The methods were tested using synthetic as well as remotely sensed data obtained from AVTRIS and LANDSAT. They were compared using unsupervised classification methods in a known ground truth area.
AB - Feature extraction, implemented as a linear projection from a higher dimensional space to a lower dimensional subspace, is a very important issue in hyperspectral data analysis. The projection must be done in a matter that minimizes the redundancy, maintaining the information content. In hyperspectral data analysis, a relevant objective of feature extraction is to reduce the dimensionality of the data maintaining the capability of discriminating object of interest from the cluttered background. This paper presents a comparative study of different unsupervised feature extraction mechanisms and shows their effects on unsupervised detection and classification. The mechanisms implemented and compared are an unsupervised SVD based band subset selection mechanism, Projection Pursuit, and Principal Component Analysis. For purposes of validating the unsupervised methods, supervised mechanisms as Discriminant Analysis and a supervised band subset selection using Bhattacharyya distance were implemented and its results were compared with the unsupervised methods. Unsupervised band subset selection based on SVD chooses automatically the most independent set of bands. Projection Pursuit based feature extraction algorithm automatically searches for projections that optimize a projection index. The projection index we optimized is one that measures the information divergence between the probability density function of the projected data and the Gaussian probability density function. This produces a projection where the probability density function of the whole data set is multi-modal, instead of a Gaussian uni-modal distribution. This augments the separability of the unknown clusters in the lower dimensional space. Finally they were compared with well-known and used Principal Component Analysis. The methods were tested using synthetic as well as remotely sensed data obtained from AVTRIS and LANDSAT. They were compared using unsupervised classification methods in a known ground truth area.
KW - Band subset selection
KW - Dimensionality reduction
KW - Feature extraction
KW - High dimensional space
KW - Hyperspectral images
KW - Pattern recognition
KW - Projection pursuit
KW - Remote sensing
KW - Unsupervised classification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038288762&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.463521
DO - 10.1117/12.463521
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:0038288762
SN - 0277-786X
VL - 4885
SP - 335
EP - 346
JO - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
JF - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
T2 - Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing VII
Y2 - 24 September 2002 through 27 September 2002
ER -