The relationship between psychology and coloniality: Interpretative repertoires

Hernan Camilo Pulido Martinez, Alba Luz Giraldo Tamayo

Producción: Contribución a una publicación especializadaArtículo

Resumen

This article presents four interpretative repertoires that cover most of the knowledge production regarding the relationship between psychology and decoloniality. These repertoires emerged from a study aimed at establishing a state of the art that determined what we know about this relationship. Following the prescriptions that have been made to carry out this type of research that deals with "research on research" (Pulido-Martinez, Giraldo Tamayo, & Escobar Altare, 2020), articles published between 2015 and 2019 were collected and analysed. The information came from the Google Scholar, Ebscot, Sage, Elsevier, Science Direct, Scielo, and Psyinfo databases. The data was classified and hierarchized for subsequent analysis following the methodological prescriptions proposed by both Barbosa, Barbosa, and Rodríguez (2013), as well as Auyoung (2020) and McKinlay & Potter (1987).
Idioma originalInglés
Páginas163-180
Número de páginas18
Volumen17
Publicación especializadaAnnual Review of Critical Psychology
EstadoPublicada - 30 ene. 2024

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The relationship between psychology and coloniality: Interpretative repertoires'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto