The Pervert’s Guide to Political Philosophy: Agonism and the Ontology of Power

Santiago Castro-Gomez

Producción: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This article is a slightly modified version of the first part of Chapter 4 of Revoluciones sin sujeto. Slavoj Žižek’s y la crítica del historicismo posmoderno (Madrid: Akal, 2015) translated by Douglas Kristopher Smith and Nicolas Lema Habash. This text seeks to overcome the scission between Slavoy Žižek and Michel Foucault by challenging the notion that Foucault lacks an ontology of power, beyond contingent historical processes. By exposing the underlying Nietzschean relational ontology of struggle—as distinct from a fundamental, positive grounding—in Foucault’s work, the piece shows how this aspect has been largely misunderstood—including by Žižek himself. Furthermore, it demonstrates how this agonistic ontology of human experience can serve to shed light on Žižek’s notion of the incompleteness of the subject by bringing it into the realm of politics.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)311-329
Número de páginas19
PublicaciónCritical Horizons
Volumen23
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2022

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The Pervert’s Guide to Political Philosophy: Agonism and the Ontology of Power'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto