TY - JOUR
T1 - The equity impacts of bus rapid transit
T2 - A review of the evidence and implications for sustainable transport
AU - Venter, Christoffel
AU - Jennings, Gail
AU - Hidalgo, Darío
AU - Valderrama Pineda, Andrés Felipe
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/2/7
Y1 - 2018/2/7
N2 - The paper offers an analysis of empirical evidence on the equity impacts of operational Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems in the Global South. The focus is on vertical equity, i.e. whether BRT systems achieve progressive benefits for poorer segments of the population. Findings from Africa, Asia, and Latin America all suggest that BRT does offer significant benefits to low-income groups, in terms of travel time and cost savings, access enhancement, and safety and health benefits. However benefits are often skewed toward medium-income users and thus less progressive than they might be. Two primary reasons for this are insufficient spatial coverage and inappropriate fare policies. While many features of BRT potentially allow it to deliver pro-poor outcomes, such outcomes only materialize if BRT implementers pay specific and sustained attention to equity. The paper identifies key issues that need to be addressed to steer BRT implementation toward more socially sustainable outcomes—including better integration with other transit, paratransit, and nonmotorized transport services, and with the housing sector.
AB - The paper offers an analysis of empirical evidence on the equity impacts of operational Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems in the Global South. The focus is on vertical equity, i.e. whether BRT systems achieve progressive benefits for poorer segments of the population. Findings from Africa, Asia, and Latin America all suggest that BRT does offer significant benefits to low-income groups, in terms of travel time and cost savings, access enhancement, and safety and health benefits. However benefits are often skewed toward medium-income users and thus less progressive than they might be. Two primary reasons for this are insufficient spatial coverage and inappropriate fare policies. While many features of BRT potentially allow it to deliver pro-poor outcomes, such outcomes only materialize if BRT implementers pay specific and sustained attention to equity. The paper identifies key issues that need to be addressed to steer BRT implementation toward more socially sustainable outcomes—including better integration with other transit, paratransit, and nonmotorized transport services, and with the housing sector.
KW - Bus rapid transit
KW - equity
KW - poverty
KW - social exclusion
KW - social impact assessment
KW - transport disadvantage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021841123&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15568318.2017.1340528
DO - 10.1080/15568318.2017.1340528
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85021841123
SN - 1556-8318
VL - 12
SP - 140
EP - 152
JO - International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
JF - International Journal of Sustainable Transportation
IS - 2
ER -