TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Factor Control and Cardiovascular Event Risk in People With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary and Secondary Prevention Settings
AU - Wright, Alison K.
AU - Suarez-Ortegon, Milton Fabian
AU - Read, Stephanie H.
AU - Kontopantelis, Evangelos
AU - Buchan, Iain
AU - Emsley, Richard
AU - Sattar, Naveed
AU - Ashcroft, Darren M.
AU - Wild, Sarah H.
AU - Rutter, Martin K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020/11/17
Y1 - 2020/11/17
N2 - BACKGROUND: To examine the association between the degree of risk factor control and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in type 2 diabetes and to assess if the presence of cardio-renal disease modifies these relationships. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using data from English practices from CPRD GOLD (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and the SCI-Diabetes dataset (Scottish Care Information-Diabetes), with linkage to hospital and mortality data. We identified 101749 with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in CPRD matched with 378938 controls without diabetes and 330892 with type 2 diabetes in SCI-Diabetes between 2006 and 2015. The main exposure was number of optimized risk factors: nonsmoker, total cholesterol ≤4 mmol/L, triglycerides ≤1.7 mmol/L, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%), systolic blood pressure <140mmHg, or <130 mmHg if high risk. Cox models were used to assess cardiovascular risk associated with levels of risk factor control. RESULTS: In CPRD, the mean baseline age in T2D was 63 years and 28% had cardio-renal disease (SCI-Diabetes: 62 years; 35% cardio-renal disease). Over 3 years follow-up (SCI-Diabetes: 6 years), CVD events occurred among 27900 (27%) CPRD-T2D, 101362 (31%) SCI-Diabetes-T2D, and 75520 (19%) CPRD-controls. In CPRD, compared with controls, T2D participants with optimal risk factor control (all risk factors controlled) had a higher risk of CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.29). In T2D participants from CPRD and SCI-Diabetes, pooled hazard ratios for CVD associated with 5 risk factors being elevated versus optimal risk factor control were 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.17) in people with cardio-renal disease but 1.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.82-2.12) in people without cardio-renal disease. People without cardio-renal disease were younger and more likely to have suboptimal risk factor control but had fewer prescriptions for risk factor modifying medications than those with cardio-renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Optimally managed people with T2D have a 21% higher CVD risk when compared with controls. People with T2D without cardio-renal disease would be predicted to benefit greatly from CVD risk factor intervention.
AB - BACKGROUND: To examine the association between the degree of risk factor control and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in type 2 diabetes and to assess if the presence of cardio-renal disease modifies these relationships. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using data from English practices from CPRD GOLD (Clinical Practice Research Datalink) and the SCI-Diabetes dataset (Scottish Care Information-Diabetes), with linkage to hospital and mortality data. We identified 101749 with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in CPRD matched with 378938 controls without diabetes and 330892 with type 2 diabetes in SCI-Diabetes between 2006 and 2015. The main exposure was number of optimized risk factors: nonsmoker, total cholesterol ≤4 mmol/L, triglycerides ≤1.7 mmol/L, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%), systolic blood pressure <140mmHg, or <130 mmHg if high risk. Cox models were used to assess cardiovascular risk associated with levels of risk factor control. RESULTS: In CPRD, the mean baseline age in T2D was 63 years and 28% had cardio-renal disease (SCI-Diabetes: 62 years; 35% cardio-renal disease). Over 3 years follow-up (SCI-Diabetes: 6 years), CVD events occurred among 27900 (27%) CPRD-T2D, 101362 (31%) SCI-Diabetes-T2D, and 75520 (19%) CPRD-controls. In CPRD, compared with controls, T2D participants with optimal risk factor control (all risk factors controlled) had a higher risk of CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.29). In T2D participants from CPRD and SCI-Diabetes, pooled hazard ratios for CVD associated with 5 risk factors being elevated versus optimal risk factor control were 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.17) in people with cardio-renal disease but 1.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.82-2.12) in people without cardio-renal disease. People without cardio-renal disease were younger and more likely to have suboptimal risk factor control but had fewer prescriptions for risk factor modifying medications than those with cardio-renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Optimally managed people with T2D have a 21% higher CVD risk when compared with controls. People with T2D without cardio-renal disease would be predicted to benefit greatly from CVD risk factor intervention.
KW - cardiovascular risk factors
KW - primary care
KW - primary prevention
KW - risk assessment
KW - secondary care
KW - secondary prevention
KW - type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096252233&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046783
DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046783
M3 - Article
C2 - 33196309
AN - SCOPUS:85096252233
SN - 0009-7322
VL - 142
SP - 1925
EP - 1936
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
IS - 20
ER -