TY - JOUR
T1 - Phenotypic characterization of canine Malassezia spp., isolates
AU - Hurtado-Suárez, Angélica
AU - Pulido-Villamarín, Adriana
AU - Linares-Linares, Melva
AU - Suárez-Fernández, Leidy
AU - Castañeda-Salazar, Rubiela
AU - Rodríguez-Bocanegra, María
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objective. To characterize and identify yeasts of the genus Malassezia by phenotypic features. Materials and methods. First, the macroscopic and microscopic morphological characteristics were described. In addition we performed biochemical and physiological assays as Tweens and Cremophor, including more. Results. Our results evidenced of 105 isolates obtained from dogs diagnosed with external otitis, it was possible to identify two distinct species from 46 isolates within the Malassezia genus: 36.19% (n=38) were identified as M. pachydermatis and 7.62% (n=8) as M. furfur. According to phenotypic patterns the remaining 56.19% (n=59) were reported as Malassezia spp., possibly corresponding to M. furfur and/or M. pachydermatis. Conclusions. Results emphasize the necessity to characterize according to species. It is not feasible to define Malassezia by species based on morphological, biochemical, and physiological findings. Therefore, molecular genotyping should be performed to identify markers allowing a more precise isolate identification. This would broaden our epidemiological knowledge regarding different species involved in canine otitis pathologies.
AB - Objective. To characterize and identify yeasts of the genus Malassezia by phenotypic features. Materials and methods. First, the macroscopic and microscopic morphological characteristics were described. In addition we performed biochemical and physiological assays as Tweens and Cremophor, including more. Results. Our results evidenced of 105 isolates obtained from dogs diagnosed with external otitis, it was possible to identify two distinct species from 46 isolates within the Malassezia genus: 36.19% (n=38) were identified as M. pachydermatis and 7.62% (n=8) as M. furfur. According to phenotypic patterns the remaining 56.19% (n=59) were reported as Malassezia spp., possibly corresponding to M. furfur and/or M. pachydermatis. Conclusions. Results emphasize the necessity to characterize according to species. It is not feasible to define Malassezia by species based on morphological, biochemical, and physiological findings. Therefore, molecular genotyping should be performed to identify markers allowing a more precise isolate identification. This would broaden our epidemiological knowledge regarding different species involved in canine otitis pathologies.
KW - (Source: CAB)
KW - Biochemical techniques
KW - External otitis
KW - Malassezia
KW - Morphology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008477839&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.21897/rmvz.827
DO - 10.21897/rmvz.827
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008477839
SN - 0122-0268
VL - 21
SP - 5535
EP - 5546
JO - Revista MVZ Cordoba
JF - Revista MVZ Cordoba
IS - 3
ER -