TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance of cervical cytology and HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening in Latin America
T2 - an analysis within the ESTAMPA study
AU - ESTAMPA study group
AU - Ramírez, Arianis Tatiana
AU - Valls, Joan
AU - Baena, Armando
AU - Rojas, Freddy David
AU - Ramírez, Katherine
AU - Álvarez, Rodrigo
AU - Cristaldo, Carmen
AU - Henríquez, Odessa
AU - Moreno, Adrián
AU - Reynaga, Daysi Colque
AU - Palma, Hans González
AU - Robinson, Isabel
AU - Hernández, Diana Carolina
AU - Bardales, Rosa
AU - Cardinal, Lucia
AU - Salgado, Yuly
AU - Martínez, Sandra
AU - González, Emmanuel
AU - Guillén, Diego
AU - Fleider, Laura
AU - Tatti, Silvio
AU - Villagra, Verónica
AU - Venegas, Gino
AU - Cruz-Valdez, Aurelio
AU - Valencia, Marleny
AU - Rodríguez, Guillermo
AU - Terán, Carolina
AU - Picconi, María Alejandra
AU - Ferrera, Annabelle
AU - Kasamatsu, Elena
AU - Mendoza, Laura
AU - Calderon, Alejandro
AU - Luciani, Silvana
AU - Broutet, Nathalie
AU - Darragh, Teresa
AU - Almonte, Maribel
AU - Herrero, Rolando
AU - Rol, Mary Luz
AU - Lucas, Eric
AU - Hernández, María de la Luz
AU - Sánchez, Gloria Inés
AU - Murillo, Raul
AU - Jerónimo, Jose
AU - Ferreccio, Catterina
AU - Rodríguez, María Isabel
AU - Cabrera, Yessy
AU - Salgado, Brenda
AU - Colucci, María Celeste
AU - Saino, Maria Agustina
AU - Rodríguez de la Peña, Margarita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Background: Cervical cytology remains widely used as the initial tool in cervical cancer screening worldwide. WHO guidelines recommend replacing cytology with primary HPV testing to reach cervical cancer elimination goals. We assessed the performance of cytology and high-risk HPV testing to detect cervical precancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) among women aged 30–64 years participating in the ESTAMPA study. Methods: Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy collection and treatment as needed. Those with no evident precancer were recalled at 18-months for a second HPV test to complete disease ascertainment. Performance indicators for cytology and HPV to detect CIN3+ were estimated. Findings: 30,606 participants with available cytology and HPV results were included in the analysis. A total of 440 histologically confirmed CIN3s and 30 cancers were diagnosed. Cytology sensitivity for CIN3+ was 48.5% (95% CI: 44.0–53.0), whereas HPV testing had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 96.3–96.7). Specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 96.3–96.7) using cytology and 88.7% (95% CI: 88.3–89.0) with HPV. Performance estimates varied substantially by study centre for cytology (ranging from 32.1% to 87.5% for sensitivity and from 89.2% to 99.5% for specificity) while for HPV results were more consistent across sites (96.7%–100% and 83.6–90.8%, respectively). Interpretation: The limited and highly variable sensitivity of cytology strongly supports transition to the more robust and reproducible HPV-based cervical screening to ensure progress towards global cervical cancer elimination targets in Latin America. Funding: IARC/WHO, UNDP, HRP/WHO, NCI and local funders.
AB - Background: Cervical cytology remains widely used as the initial tool in cervical cancer screening worldwide. WHO guidelines recommend replacing cytology with primary HPV testing to reach cervical cancer elimination goals. We assessed the performance of cytology and high-risk HPV testing to detect cervical precancer, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or worse (CIN3+) among women aged 30–64 years participating in the ESTAMPA study. Methods: Women were screened with cytology and HPV across ESTAMPA study centres in Latin America. Screen-positives were referred to colposcopy with biopsy collection and treatment as needed. Those with no evident precancer were recalled at 18-months for a second HPV test to complete disease ascertainment. Performance indicators for cytology and HPV to detect CIN3+ were estimated. Findings: 30,606 participants with available cytology and HPV results were included in the analysis. A total of 440 histologically confirmed CIN3s and 30 cancers were diagnosed. Cytology sensitivity for CIN3+ was 48.5% (95% CI: 44.0–53.0), whereas HPV testing had a sensitivity of 98.1% (95% CI: 96.3–96.7). Specificity was 96.5% (95% CI: 96.3–96.7) using cytology and 88.7% (95% CI: 88.3–89.0) with HPV. Performance estimates varied substantially by study centre for cytology (ranging from 32.1% to 87.5% for sensitivity and from 89.2% to 99.5% for specificity) while for HPV results were more consistent across sites (96.7%–100% and 83.6–90.8%, respectively). Interpretation: The limited and highly variable sensitivity of cytology strongly supports transition to the more robust and reproducible HPV-based cervical screening to ensure progress towards global cervical cancer elimination targets in Latin America. Funding: IARC/WHO, UNDP, HRP/WHO, NCI and local funders.
KW - Cervical cytology
KW - ESTAMPA
KW - HPV testing
KW - Screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172004989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100593
DO - 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100593
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85172004989
SN - 2667-193X
VL - 26
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
M1 - 100593
ER -