TY - GEN
T1 - On TinyML WiFi Fingerprinting-Based Indoor Localization
T2 - 21st IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2024
AU - Mendez, Diego
AU - Zennaro, Marco
AU - Altayeb, Moez
AU - Manzoni, Pietro
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - As context-aware location-based services (LBS) become increasingly important in many Internet of Things (IoT) verticals, such as logistics or industry 4.0, indoor localization is now an essential feature to be integrated in these solutions. For this purpose, fingerprinting-based solutions arise as a feasible solution, especially when integrating artificial intelligence on the edge, supported by computational and memory-restricted embedded devices, as it does not depend on a cloud-based deployment. In this work, we integrate this new paradigm, known as TinyML, and compare the implementation of a machine learning (ML) model when using only WiFi Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) data. We tested two different scenarios, a single sample or time series, with different configurations of the trained neural network. Our results show that a CSI data ML model always outperforms an equivalent RSSI approach, with a massive difference in performance for the time-series case.
AB - As context-aware location-based services (LBS) become increasingly important in many Internet of Things (IoT) verticals, such as logistics or industry 4.0, indoor localization is now an essential feature to be integrated in these solutions. For this purpose, fingerprinting-based solutions arise as a feasible solution, especially when integrating artificial intelligence on the edge, supported by computational and memory-restricted embedded devices, as it does not depend on a cloud-based deployment. In this work, we integrate this new paradigm, known as TinyML, and compare the implementation of a machine learning (ML) model when using only WiFi Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or WiFi Channel State Information (CSI) data. We tested two different scenarios, a single sample or time series, with different configurations of the trained neural network. Our results show that a CSI data ML model always outperforms an equivalent RSSI approach, with a massive difference in performance for the time-series case.
KW - edge computing
KW - indoor
KW - localization
KW - machine learning
KW - tinyML
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189205095&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454828
DO - 10.1109/CCNC51664.2024.10454828
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85189205095
T3 - Proceedings - IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC
BT - 2024 IEEE 21st Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, CCNC 2024
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 6 January 2024 through 9 January 2024
ER -