TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonlinear and complementary effects of responsive and proactive market orientation on firms’ competitive advantage
AU - Osorio Tinoco, Fabian F.
AU - Hernández-Espallardo, Miguel
AU - Rodriguez-Orejuela, Augusto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/4/21
Y1 - 2020/4/21
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to clarify how responsive market orientation (RMO) and proactive market orientation (PMO) create competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach: Nonlinear and interaction effects are tested by applying hierarchical regression analysis to a sample of 272 Colombian manufacturing companies. Findings: The results show that although market orientation promotes the competitive advantage of a business, both approaches – responsive and proactive – exhibit saturation effects and a positive interaction. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design and the use of a single source for data collection. It is suggested that future research includes different orientations combined with these two market orientations – responsive and proactive – for achieving competitive advantage. In addition, further studies could replicate this analysis for different environmental conditions. Originality/value: This paper simultaneously evaluates the nonlinear and complementary effects of RMO and PMO. From a strategic standpoint, it presents an empirical confirmation of the familiarity trap, the failure trap and the positive effects of combining RMO and PMO.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to clarify how responsive market orientation (RMO) and proactive market orientation (PMO) create competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach: Nonlinear and interaction effects are tested by applying hierarchical regression analysis to a sample of 272 Colombian manufacturing companies. Findings: The results show that although market orientation promotes the competitive advantage of a business, both approaches – responsive and proactive – exhibit saturation effects and a positive interaction. Research limitations/implications: The main limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design and the use of a single source for data collection. It is suggested that future research includes different orientations combined with these two market orientations – responsive and proactive – for achieving competitive advantage. In addition, further studies could replicate this analysis for different environmental conditions. Originality/value: This paper simultaneously evaluates the nonlinear and complementary effects of RMO and PMO. From a strategic standpoint, it presents an empirical confirmation of the familiarity trap, the failure trap and the positive effects of combining RMO and PMO.
KW - Competitive advantage
KW - Proactive market orientation
KW - Responsive market orientation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075553087&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/APJML-01-2019-0058
DO - 10.1108/APJML-01-2019-0058
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075553087
SN - 1355-5855
VL - 32
SP - 841
EP - 859
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
IS - 4
ER -