TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction
T2 - Results of a comparative multicenter study
AU - Gómez, Daniel
AU - Cabrera, Luis F.
AU - Pedraza, Mauricio
AU - Mendoza, Andres
AU - Pulido, Jean
AU - Villarreal, Ricardo
AU - Urrutia, Andres
AU - Sanchez-Ussa, Sebastian
AU - Di Saverio, Salomone
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Academia Mexicana de Cirugía. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the terms of the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Aim of the study: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction (SBO) is getting increasingly normal. In patients with multiple adhesive SBOs (MASBO), laparoscopic approaches might increase the risk of bowel injury due to the distended and potentially compromised small bowel. It remains a challenge to the surgeons, entails an interdisciplinary team, trying to achieve the least complications as possible. The study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic procedures (multi-port vs. single-port) in the management of MASBO. Patients and Methods: Comparative study of 68 patients with post-operative MASBO treated with Single-Port single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery in two centers of Bogota, Colombia between January 2013 and June 2018. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic management, 27 patients by SILS, and 41 patients by multi-port. The average surgical time in the multiport approach was 167 min versus SILS with 129 min. Laparoscopic intestinal resection was performed in 4.4% of patients, through multi-port using intracorporeal anastomosis. Mean hospital stay of 3.2 days for the SILS approach versus multi-port in 2.2 days. Conclusions: Both laparoscopic approaches, in MASBO treatment is feasible in qualified hands. Patient selection and medical judgment seem to be the most essential factors for a positive result.
AB - Aim of the study: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction (SBO) is getting increasingly normal. In patients with multiple adhesive SBOs (MASBO), laparoscopic approaches might increase the risk of bowel injury due to the distended and potentially compromised small bowel. It remains a challenge to the surgeons, entails an interdisciplinary team, trying to achieve the least complications as possible. The study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic procedures (multi-port vs. single-port) in the management of MASBO. Patients and Methods: Comparative study of 68 patients with post-operative MASBO treated with Single-Port single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery in two centers of Bogota, Colombia between January 2013 and June 2018. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic management, 27 patients by SILS, and 41 patients by multi-port. The average surgical time in the multiport approach was 167 min versus SILS with 129 min. Laparoscopic intestinal resection was performed in 4.4% of patients, through multi-port using intracorporeal anastomosis. Mean hospital stay of 3.2 days for the SILS approach versus multi-port in 2.2 days. Conclusions: Both laparoscopic approaches, in MASBO treatment is feasible in qualified hands. Patient selection and medical judgment seem to be the most essential factors for a positive result.
KW - Hand-assisted laparoscopy
KW - Intestinal obstruction
KW - Laparoscopy
KW - Surgery
KW - Tissue adhesions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121735596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.24875/CIRU.20000895
DO - 10.24875/CIRU.20000895
M3 - Article
C2 - 34851576
AN - SCOPUS:85121735596
SN - 0009-7411
VL - 89
SP - 710
EP - 717
JO - Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition)
JF - Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition)
IS - 6
ER -