TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating Scale Effects on Experimental Shear Strength of Earthen Walls (Adobe and Rammed-Earth)
AU - Ruiz, Daniel M.
AU - Reyes, Juan C.
AU - ALVARADO VARGAS, YEZID ALEXANDER
AU - VACCA GAMEZ, HERMES ARIEL
AU - Tarque, Nicola
AU - Jerez, Sandra
PY - 2025/2/22
Y1 - 2025/2/22
N2 - This study investigates the scale effects on the experimental shear strengthof earthen walls, a critical parameter influencing the seismic performance of adobe andrammed-earth (RE) buildings. Recognized for their historical significance and sustainableconstruction practices, earthen structures require a comprehensive understanding of theirmechanical behavior under shear loads to ensure effective design and preservation. Thisresearch compiles data from over 120 in-plane shear wall tests (adobe and RE), nearly20 direct shear tests from the scientific and technical literature, and new cyclic directshear tests performed on large cubic specimens (300 mm side length) made from thesame material as a previously tested two-story RE wall. Based on the findings, this studyrecommends a minimum specimen cross-sectional area of 0.5 m2 for reliable shear strengthtesting of earthen walls in structural laboratories. This recommendation aims to prevent theunconservative overestimation of shear strength commonly observed in smaller specimens,including direct shear tests. Furthermore, the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion outlined inthe AIS-610 Colombian standard is validated as a conservative lower bound for all compiledshear strength data. Cyclic direct shear tests on nine 300 mm cubic specimens produceda Mohr–Coulomb envelope with an apparent cohesion of 0.0715 MPa and a slope of 0.66,whereas the full-scale two-story wall (5.95 × 6.20 × 0.65 m) constructed with the samematerial exhibited a much lower cohesion of 0.0139 MPa and a slope of 0.26. The analysisreveals significant scale effects, as small-scale specimens consistently overestimate shearstrength due to their inability to capture macro-structural behaviors such as compactionlayer interactions, construction joint weaknesses, and stress redistributions. Based on theanalysis of the compiled data, the novelty of this study lies in defining a strength reductionfactor for direct shear tests (3.4–3.8 for rammed earth, ~3.0 for adobe) to align with full-scalewall behavior, as well as establishing a minimum specimen size (≥0.5 m2) for reliablein-plane shear testing of earthen walls, ensuring accurate structural assessments of shearstrength. This study provides a first approach to the shear behavior of unstabilized earth.To expand its application, future research should explore how the scale of specimens withdifferent stabilizers affects their shear strength.
AB - This study investigates the scale effects on the experimental shear strengthof earthen walls, a critical parameter influencing the seismic performance of adobe andrammed-earth (RE) buildings. Recognized for their historical significance and sustainableconstruction practices, earthen structures require a comprehensive understanding of theirmechanical behavior under shear loads to ensure effective design and preservation. Thisresearch compiles data from over 120 in-plane shear wall tests (adobe and RE), nearly20 direct shear tests from the scientific and technical literature, and new cyclic directshear tests performed on large cubic specimens (300 mm side length) made from thesame material as a previously tested two-story RE wall. Based on the findings, this studyrecommends a minimum specimen cross-sectional area of 0.5 m2 for reliable shear strengthtesting of earthen walls in structural laboratories. This recommendation aims to prevent theunconservative overestimation of shear strength commonly observed in smaller specimens,including direct shear tests. Furthermore, the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion outlined inthe AIS-610 Colombian standard is validated as a conservative lower bound for all compiledshear strength data. Cyclic direct shear tests on nine 300 mm cubic specimens produceda Mohr–Coulomb envelope with an apparent cohesion of 0.0715 MPa and a slope of 0.66,whereas the full-scale two-story wall (5.95 × 6.20 × 0.65 m) constructed with the samematerial exhibited a much lower cohesion of 0.0139 MPa and a slope of 0.26. The analysisreveals significant scale effects, as small-scale specimens consistently overestimate shearstrength due to their inability to capture macro-structural behaviors such as compactionlayer interactions, construction joint weaknesses, and stress redistributions. Based on theanalysis of the compiled data, the novelty of this study lies in defining a strength reductionfactor for direct shear tests (3.4–3.8 for rammed earth, ~3.0 for adobe) to align with full-scalewall behavior, as well as establishing a minimum specimen size (≥0.5 m2) for reliablein-plane shear testing of earthen walls, ensuring accurate structural assessments of shearstrength. This study provides a first approach to the shear behavior of unstabilized earth.To expand its application, future research should explore how the scale of specimens withdifferent stabilizers affects their shear strength.
KW - shear strength
KW - rammed-earth walls
KW - adobe walls
KW - direct shear tests
KW - static and pseudo-static in-plane load shear tests
KW - shear strength
KW - rammed-earth walls
KW - adobe walls
KW - direct shear tests
KW - static and pseudo-static in-plane load shear tests Buildings
UR - https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15050689
U2 - 10.3390/buildings15050689
DO - 10.3390/buildings15050689
M3 - Article
SN - 2075-5309
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 30
JO - Buildings
JF - Buildings
IS - 5
M1 - 689
ER -