TY - JOUR
T1 - Gaps in beliefs and practice in dyslipidaemia management in Japan, Germany, Colombia and the Philippines
T2 - Insights from a web-based physician survey
AU - Barter, Philip J.
AU - Yamashita, Shizuya
AU - Laufs, Ulrich
AU - Ruiz, Alvaro J.
AU - Sy, Rody
AU - Fang, Mark David G.
AU - Folco, Emanuela
AU - Libby, Peter
AU - Matsuzawa, Yuji
AU - Santos, Raul D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/6/10
Y1 - 2020/6/10
N2 - Background: Implementing evidence-based management of dyslipidaemia is a challenge worldwide. Objectives: To understand physician beliefs and behaviour and identify uncertainties in dyslipidaemia management across four world regions. Methods: Web-based survey of 1758 physicians in Japan, Germany, Colombia and the Philippines who were selected randomly from existing databases. Key inclusion criteria were 1) for cardiologists and diabetes/endocrinology specialists: ≥50 dyslipidaemia patients examined in the last month; 2) for specialists in neurology/neurosurgery/stroke medicine: ≥50 dyslipidaemia patients and ≥ 20 patients with a history of ischaemic stroke examined in the last month; and 3) for specialists in nephrology and general medicine: based at centres with ≥20 beds and ≥ 50 dyslipidaemia patients examined in the last month. The self-report survey covered dyslipidaemia management, target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in different patient groups, and statin safety. All physicians gave voluntary consent and all data were anonymised. Analysis was solely descriptive. Results: The survey highlighted key areas of uncertainty in dyslipidaemia management in the four countries. These related to LDL-C targets in different patient groups, the safety of low LDL-C levels, the safety of statins, especially for effects on cognitive, renal and hepatic function and for haemorrhagic stroke risk, and lipid management strategies in patients with chronic kidney disease, including those with concomitant hypertriglyceridaemia. Conclusions: This survey of physicians in Japan, Germany, Colombia and the Philippines has identified key gaps in knowledge about dyslipidaemia management. These relate to the safety of low LDL-C levels, the safety of statins, and lipid management of chronic kidney disease. The findings from this survey highlight the need for further education to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations for dyslipidaemia management.
AB - Background: Implementing evidence-based management of dyslipidaemia is a challenge worldwide. Objectives: To understand physician beliefs and behaviour and identify uncertainties in dyslipidaemia management across four world regions. Methods: Web-based survey of 1758 physicians in Japan, Germany, Colombia and the Philippines who were selected randomly from existing databases. Key inclusion criteria were 1) for cardiologists and diabetes/endocrinology specialists: ≥50 dyslipidaemia patients examined in the last month; 2) for specialists in neurology/neurosurgery/stroke medicine: ≥50 dyslipidaemia patients and ≥ 20 patients with a history of ischaemic stroke examined in the last month; and 3) for specialists in nephrology and general medicine: based at centres with ≥20 beds and ≥ 50 dyslipidaemia patients examined in the last month. The self-report survey covered dyslipidaemia management, target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in different patient groups, and statin safety. All physicians gave voluntary consent and all data were anonymised. Analysis was solely descriptive. Results: The survey highlighted key areas of uncertainty in dyslipidaemia management in the four countries. These related to LDL-C targets in different patient groups, the safety of low LDL-C levels, the safety of statins, especially for effects on cognitive, renal and hepatic function and for haemorrhagic stroke risk, and lipid management strategies in patients with chronic kidney disease, including those with concomitant hypertriglyceridaemia. Conclusions: This survey of physicians in Japan, Germany, Colombia and the Philippines has identified key gaps in knowledge about dyslipidaemia management. These relate to the safety of low LDL-C levels, the safety of statins, and lipid management of chronic kidney disease. The findings from this survey highlight the need for further education to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations for dyslipidaemia management.
KW - Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
KW - Chronic kidney disease
KW - Haemorrhagic stroke
KW - Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
KW - Safety
KW - Statins
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086354379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12944-020-01265-z
DO - 10.1186/s12944-020-01265-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 32522192
AN - SCOPUS:85086354379
SN - 1476-511X
VL - 19
JO - Lipids in Health and Disease
JF - Lipids in Health and Disease
IS - 1
M1 - 131
ER -