TY - JOUR
T1 - Framed field experiment on resource scarcity & extraction
T2 - Path-dependent generosity within sequential water appropriation
AU - Pfaff, Alexander
AU - Vélez, Maria Alejandra
AU - Ramos, Pablo Andres
AU - Molina, Adriana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V..
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - How one treats others is important within collective action. We ask if resource scarcity in the past, due to its effects upon past behaviors, influences current other-regarding behaviors. Contrasting theories and empirical findings on scarcity motivate our framed field experiment. Participants are rural Colombian farmers who have experienced scarcity of water within irrigation. We randomly assign participants to groups and places on group canals. Places order extraction decisions. Our treatments are sequences of scarcities: 'from lower to higher resources' involves four rounds each of 20, 60, then 100 units of water; 'from higher to lower resources' reverses the ordering. We find that upstream farmers extract more, but a lower share, when facing higher resources. Further they take a larger share of higher resources when they faced lower resources in earlier rounds (relative to when facing higher resources initially). That is inconsistent with leading models of responses to scarcity which focus upon one's own gain. It is consistent with lowering one's weight on others to, for instance, rationalize having left them little. Our results suggest that facing higher scarcity can erode the bases for collective actions. For establishing new institutions, timing relative to scarcity could affect the probability of success.
AB - How one treats others is important within collective action. We ask if resource scarcity in the past, due to its effects upon past behaviors, influences current other-regarding behaviors. Contrasting theories and empirical findings on scarcity motivate our framed field experiment. Participants are rural Colombian farmers who have experienced scarcity of water within irrigation. We randomly assign participants to groups and places on group canals. Places order extraction decisions. Our treatments are sequences of scarcities: 'from lower to higher resources' involves four rounds each of 20, 60, then 100 units of water; 'from higher to lower resources' reverses the ordering. We find that upstream farmers extract more, but a lower share, when facing higher resources. Further they take a larger share of higher resources when they faced lower resources in earlier rounds (relative to when facing higher resources initially). That is inconsistent with leading models of responses to scarcity which focus upon one's own gain. It is consistent with lowering one's weight on others to, for instance, rationalize having left them little. Our results suggest that facing higher scarcity can erode the bases for collective actions. For establishing new institutions, timing relative to scarcity could affect the probability of success.
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=pure_puj3&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000366793000040&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84948156777
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 120
SP - 416
EP - 429
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -