TY - JOUR
T1 - Formative Assessment in Engineering Courses at PUJ
T2 - 16th International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education and 21st International Conference on Active Learning in Engineering Education Workshop, PAEE/ALE 2024
AU - González, Alejandra M.
AU - León, María P.
AU - Vacca, Hermes A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 University of Minho. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - The role of assessment is pivotal in the teaching-learning process, serving as a guiding tool for students to understand the necessary improvements to achieve competency. While summative assessment remains prevalent in teacher-centered learning approaches, a shift towards curriculum reform, such as the CDIO initiative at the School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, is fostering a transition towards more active, student-centered pedagogical practices. Given the fundamental nature of evaluation in teaching, this study integrates data from surveys and interviews to explore faculty evaluative practices and their conceptualizations of assessment. Key factors essential for effective feedback and transparency within the assessment framework, including the communication of learning outcomes and assessment criteria, undergo thorough examination. Findings reveal that approximately half of the faculty members prioritize encouraging students' critical reflection on their learning processes, aligning with their feedback strategies. However, some faculty still lean towards grading of student knowledge. This study lays the groundwork for continued discussion on assessment processes within the School of Engineering.
AB - The role of assessment is pivotal in the teaching-learning process, serving as a guiding tool for students to understand the necessary improvements to achieve competency. While summative assessment remains prevalent in teacher-centered learning approaches, a shift towards curriculum reform, such as the CDIO initiative at the School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, is fostering a transition towards more active, student-centered pedagogical practices. Given the fundamental nature of evaluation in teaching, this study integrates data from surveys and interviews to explore faculty evaluative practices and their conceptualizations of assessment. Key factors essential for effective feedback and transparency within the assessment framework, including the communication of learning outcomes and assessment criteria, undergo thorough examination. Findings reveal that approximately half of the faculty members prioritize encouraging students' critical reflection on their learning processes, aligning with their feedback strategies. However, some faculty still lean towards grading of student knowledge. This study lays the groundwork for continued discussion on assessment processes within the School of Engineering.
KW - Active Learning
KW - Assessment
KW - Engineering Education
KW - Faculty
KW - Feedback
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210832068&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5281/zenodo.14060976
DO - 10.5281/zenodo.14060976
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85210832068
SN - 2183-1378
VL - 14
SP - 224
EP - 231
JO - International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education
JF - International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education
Y2 - 24 July 2024 through 26 July 2024
ER -