Resumen
The text strives to clarify the meaning of the naturalistic fallacy and the Hume's law, departing from the traditional understanding according to which it would not be possible to derive an ought from an is, nor an evaluative judgment from a descriptive one. The reflections close analyzing the performance capacity of the naturalist fallacy and Hume's law in criminal law. In particular, showing how they are used as a strategy to cover up the radically political nature of legislation.
Título traducido de la contribución | Naturalistic fallacy and Hume's law: Its meaning in criminal law |
---|---|
Idioma original | Español |
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 49-72 |
Número de páginas | 24 |
Publicación | Revista Chilena de Derecho |
Volumen | 47 |
N.º | 1 |
DOI | |
Estado | Publicada - abr. 2020 |
Palabras clave
- Criminal law
- Democracy
- Hume's law
- Naturalistic fallacy
- Practical syllogism