TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy, cost-minimization, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for basal cell carcinoma patients to reduce low-value follow-up care
AU - Egmond, Sven van
AU - van Vliet, Ella D.
AU - Wakkee, Marlies
AU - Hollestein, Loes M.
AU - Pouwels, Xavier G.L.V.
AU - Koffijberg, Hendrik
AU - Misirli, Yesim
AU - Bakkum, Rachel S.L.A.
AU - Bastiaens, Maarten T.
AU - Kukutsch, Nicole A.
AU - Oosting, Albert J.
AU - Plasmeijer, Elsemieke I.
AU - van Rengen, Annik
AU - de Roos, Kees Peter
AU - Nijsten, Tamar E.C.
AU - de Vries, Esther
AU - de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 van Egmond et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Background The incidence of keratinocyte carcinomas is high and rapidly growing. Approximately 80% of keratinocyte carcinomas consist of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) with 50% of these being considered as low-risk tumors. Nevertheless, 83% of the low-risk BCC patients were found to receive more follow-up care than recommended according to the Dutch BCC guideline, which is one visit post-treatment for this group. More efficient management could reduce unnecessary follow-up care and related costs. Objectives To study the efficacy, cost-utility, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for low-risk BCC patients compared with usual care (no personalized letter). Methods In a multi-center intervention study, a personalized discharge letter in addition to usual care was compared to usual care in first-time BCC patients. Model-based cost-utility and budget impact analyses were conducted, using individual patient data gathered via surveys. The outcome measures were number of follow-up visits, costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) per patient. Results A total of 473 first-time BCC patients were recruited. The personalized discharge letter decreased the number of follow-up visits by 14.8% in the first year. The incremental costs after five years were -24.45 per patient. The QALYs were 4.12 after five years and very similar in both groups. The national budget impact was -2,7 million after five years. Conclusions The distribution of a personalized discharge letter decreases the number of unnecessary follow-up visits and implementing the intervention in a large eligible population would results in substantial cost savings, contributing to restraining the growing BCC costs.
AB - Background The incidence of keratinocyte carcinomas is high and rapidly growing. Approximately 80% of keratinocyte carcinomas consist of basal cell carcinomas (BCC) with 50% of these being considered as low-risk tumors. Nevertheless, 83% of the low-risk BCC patients were found to receive more follow-up care than recommended according to the Dutch BCC guideline, which is one visit post-treatment for this group. More efficient management could reduce unnecessary follow-up care and related costs. Objectives To study the efficacy, cost-utility, and budget impact of a personalized discharge letter for low-risk BCC patients compared with usual care (no personalized letter). Methods In a multi-center intervention study, a personalized discharge letter in addition to usual care was compared to usual care in first-time BCC patients. Model-based cost-utility and budget impact analyses were conducted, using individual patient data gathered via surveys. The outcome measures were number of follow-up visits, costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) per patient. Results A total of 473 first-time BCC patients were recruited. The personalized discharge letter decreased the number of follow-up visits by 14.8% in the first year. The incremental costs after five years were -24.45 per patient. The QALYs were 4.12 after five years and very similar in both groups. The national budget impact was -2,7 million after five years. Conclusions The distribution of a personalized discharge letter decreases the number of unnecessary follow-up visits and implementing the intervention in a large eligible population would results in substantial cost savings, contributing to restraining the growing BCC costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123538636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0260978
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0260978
M3 - Article
C2 - 35073333
AN - SCOPUS:85123538636
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 17
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 1 1
M1 - e0260978
ER -