TY - JOUR
T1 - Determination of time in range associated with HbA1c ≤ 6.5% in Latin American pregnant women diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus using an automated insulin delivery system
AU - María Gómez Medina, Ana
AU - Juliana Soto Chávez, María
AU - Cristina Henao Carrillo, Diana
AU - Camilo Salgado Sánchez, Juan
AU - Alberto Gómez González, Javier
AU - Grassi, Bruno
AU - Mauricio Muñoz Velandia, Oscar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Aims: To determine the correlation between %TIR and HbA1c in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). Methods: Diagnostic test study in a prospective cohort of pregnant patients with DM1 using automated insulin delivery system (AID) in Colombia and Chile. Results: Fifty-two patients were included [mean age 31.8 ± 6.2 years, pregestational HbA1c 7.2% [interquartile range (IQR), 6.5–8.2]. During follow-up, we found a better metabolic control during the second (HbA1c 6.40%, IQR 5.9,7.1) and third trimesters (HbA1c 6.25%;IQR 5.9,6.8). A weak and negative correlation between %TIR and HbA1c was found for all the gestation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient:-0.22, p:0.0329), and in the second (r:-0.13, p: 0.38) and third trimesters (r:-0.26, p = 0.08). %TIR had poor discriminating capacity for predicting HbA1c < 6% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.46–0.72) and for predicting HbA1c < 6.5% (AUC, 0.57;95% CI,0.44–0.70). The optimal cutoff points for %TIR were > 66.1% for predicting HbA1c < 6% (65% sensitivity, 62% specificity) and %TIR > 61.1% for HbA1c < 6.5% (59% sensitivity, 54% specificity). Conclusion: The correlation between HbA1c and %TIR during pregnancy was weak. The optimal cutoff points for identifying patients with HbA1c < 6.0% and < 6.5% were %TIR > 66.1% and > 61.1%, respectively, with moderate sensitivity and specificity.
AB - Aims: To determine the correlation between %TIR and HbA1c in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). Methods: Diagnostic test study in a prospective cohort of pregnant patients with DM1 using automated insulin delivery system (AID) in Colombia and Chile. Results: Fifty-two patients were included [mean age 31.8 ± 6.2 years, pregestational HbA1c 7.2% [interquartile range (IQR), 6.5–8.2]. During follow-up, we found a better metabolic control during the second (HbA1c 6.40%, IQR 5.9,7.1) and third trimesters (HbA1c 6.25%;IQR 5.9,6.8). A weak and negative correlation between %TIR and HbA1c was found for all the gestation (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient:-0.22, p:0.0329), and in the second (r:-0.13, p: 0.38) and third trimesters (r:-0.26, p = 0.08). %TIR had poor discriminating capacity for predicting HbA1c < 6% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI],0.46–0.72) and for predicting HbA1c < 6.5% (AUC, 0.57;95% CI,0.44–0.70). The optimal cutoff points for %TIR were > 66.1% for predicting HbA1c < 6% (65% sensitivity, 62% specificity) and %TIR > 61.1% for HbA1c < 6.5% (59% sensitivity, 54% specificity). Conclusion: The correlation between HbA1c and %TIR during pregnancy was weak. The optimal cutoff points for identifying patients with HbA1c < 6.0% and < 6.5% were %TIR > 66.1% and > 61.1%, respectively, with moderate sensitivity and specificity.
KW - Continuous glucose monitoring
KW - Glycated hemoglobin A1c
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Time in range
KW - Type 1 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159635937&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110713
DO - 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110713
M3 - Article
C2 - 37187225
AN - SCOPUS:85159635937
SN - 0168-8227
VL - 200
JO - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
JF - Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
M1 - 110713
ER -