TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical reflections on the municipal epidemiological resilience index used for public policy decision-making regarding the control of the covid-19 pandemic in Colombia
AU - Eslava-Schmalbach, Javier
AU - Restrepo-Henao, Alexandra
AU - Guarnizo-Herreño, Carol
AU - Castillo, Juan Sebastián
AU - Vega-Romero, Román
AU - Arbeláez, María Patricia
AU - Pardo-Turriago, Rodrigo
AU - Díaz, Paula Andrea
AU - Gaitán-Duarte, Hernando
AU - Cantor-Cruz, Francy
AU - Osorio, Lyda
AU - Andia, Tatiana
AU - Gómez-Restrepo, Carlos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - On June 2, 2021, the Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Protection, through Resolution No. 777, laid down the requirements to resume all restricted economic and social activities. Similarly, said Resolution established the Municipal Epidemiological Resilience Index (IREM by its acronym in Spanish) as a tool to support decision-making regarding this economic reactivation amid the third epidemic peak of COVID-19 in the country. The purpose of this article is to perform a critical analysis of the technical aspects of the IREM and to explore the feasibility of its implementation as a support for the resumption of economic and social activities as proposed in the Resolution. The present critical analysis emphasizes on the lack of a clear definition of epidemiological resilience that is consistent with the scientific literature. Furthermore, the face and content validity of the index, as well as the construct validity of the index and of its dimensions, are called into question and, therefore, the feasibility of using it to determine said resumption.
AB - On June 2, 2021, the Colombian Ministry of Health and Social Protection, through Resolution No. 777, laid down the requirements to resume all restricted economic and social activities. Similarly, said Resolution established the Municipal Epidemiological Resilience Index (IREM by its acronym in Spanish) as a tool to support decision-making regarding this economic reactivation amid the third epidemic peak of COVID-19 in the country. The purpose of this article is to perform a critical analysis of the technical aspects of the IREM and to explore the feasibility of its implementation as a support for the resumption of economic and social activities as proposed in the Resolution. The present critical analysis emphasizes on the lack of a clear definition of epidemiological resilience that is consistent with the scientific literature. Furthermore, the face and content validity of the index, as well as the construct validity of the index and of its dimensions, are called into question and, therefore, the feasibility of using it to determine said resumption.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Health Policy
KW - Resilience
KW - Validity (MeSH)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114251704&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15446/revfacmed.v69n2.96644
DO - 10.15446/revfacmed.v69n2.96644
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114251704
SN - 0120-0011
VL - 69
JO - Revista Facultad de Medicina
JF - Revista Facultad de Medicina
IS - 2
M1 - e96644
ER -