Resumen
In the original publication of this article [1], an incorrect description of the IFCC Working Group on CGM recommendations was included in Results sections. The incorrect and correct description are displayed below: In Results section, under fifth paragraph of “Rationale” heading, the sentence should read, “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM [16], at least 7.5% of all values should cover each of the following situations: BG< 70 mg/dL; BG>300 mg/dL; BG≥ 70 mg/dL with rate of change < –1 mg/dL/min or BG < 70 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change; and BG ≤ 300 mg/dL with rate of change >+1.5 mg/dL/min or BG >250 mg/dL within 30 minutes at the current rate of change” instead of “In line with the IFCC Working Group on CGM, at least 20% of paired samples should be obtained within each predefined rate-of-change stratum (≤ 1, 1–2, and >2 mg dL⁻¹ min⁻¹) [16]”. The original article has been corrected.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Número de artículo | 436 |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 436 |
| Publicación | Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome |
| Volumen | 17 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 20 nov. 2025 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Correction: Consensus statement on standardizing CGM evaluation metrics in Latin america: an expert approach'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver