Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Carlos Andres Devia; Johan Pena; Lizeth Roldan; Diego Patino

doi:10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Carlos Andres Devia, Johan Pena, Lizeth Roldan, Diego Patino

Departamento de Ingeniería Electrónica

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

Producción: Capítulo del libro/informe/acta de congreso › Contribución a la conferencia › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

Idioma original	Inglés
Título de la publicación alojada	2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings
Editores	Diego Patino, Eugenio Yime
Editorial	Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Páginas	1-5
Número de páginas	5
ISBN (versión digital)	9781538603987
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391
Estado	Publicada - 02 jul. 2017
Evento	3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Cartagena, Colombia Duración: 18 oct. 2017 → 20 oct. 2017

Serie de la publicación

Nombre	2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings
Volumen	2018-January

Conferencia

Conferencia	3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017
País/Territorio	Colombia
Ciudad	Cartagena
Período	18/10/17 → 20/10/17

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

Acceder al documento

10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

Devia, C. A., Pena, J., Roldan, L., & Patino, D. (2017). Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. En D. Patino, & E. Yime (Eds.), 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-5). (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2018-January). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Devia, Carlos Andres ; Pena, Johan ; Roldan, Lizeth et al. / Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. editor / Diego Patino ; Eugenio Yime. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. pp. 1-5 (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings).

@inproceedings{ddb977efd6e948f69f09bf78a9cb1491,

title = "Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking",

abstract = "This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.",

keywords = "Extremum-Seeking Control, Maximum Power Point Tracking, Model Free Optimization, Real-Time Optimization",

author = "Devia, \{Carlos Andres\} and Johan Pena and Lizeth Roldan and Diego Patino",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 IEEE.; 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 ; Conference date: 18-10-2017 Through 20-10-2017",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391",

language = "English",

series = "2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",

pages = "1--5",

editor = "Diego Patino and Eugenio Yime",

booktitle = "2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings",

address = "United States",

}

Devia, CA, Pena, J, Roldan, L & Patino, D 2017, Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. En D Patino & E Yime (eds.), 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings, vol. 2018-January, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp. 1-5, 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017, Cartagena, Colombia, 18/10/17. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. / Devia, Carlos Andres; Pena, Johan; Roldan, Lizeth et al.
2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. ed. / Diego Patino; Eugenio Yime. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017. p. 1-5 (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings; Vol. 2018-January).

Producción: Capítulo del libro/informe/acta de congreso › Contribución a la conferencia › revisión exhaustiva

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

AU - Devia, Carlos Andres

AU - Pena, Johan

AU - Roldan, Lizeth

AU - Patino, Diego

PY - 2017/7/2

Y1 - 2017/7/2

N2 - This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

AB - This paper addresses the Maximum Power Point Tracking comparing the performance of two model free methods, Luke's Method and Extremum Seeking Control. The model used for the photovoltaic (PV) cell is the Double Diode Model. Both methods were tested in a single panel and in an array with shadowing. The result is that although the two methods are very efficient Luke's Method proved to be better than Extremum Seeking Control in both circumstances.

KW - Extremum-Seeking Control

KW - Maximum Power Point Tracking

KW - Model Free Optimization

KW - Real-Time Optimization

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85047390579

U2 - 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

DO - 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85047390579

T3 - 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings

SP - 1

EP - 5

BT - 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings

A2 - Patino, Diego

A2 - Yime, Eugenio

PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

T2 - 3rd IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017

Y2 - 18 October 2017 through 20 October 2017

ER -

Devia CA, Pena J, Roldan L, Patino D. Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking. En Patino D, Yime E, editores, 2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. 2017. p. 1-5. (2017 IEEE 3rd Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, CCAC 2017 - Conference Proceedings). doi: 10.1109/CCAC.2017.8276391

Comparison of two model free optimization techniques for maximum power point tracking

Resumen

Serie de la publicación

Conferencia

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto