TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison Between Guided and Non-Guided Homework as a Tool for Learning Electric Circuit Theory
AU - Hurtado, Jairo A
AU - Diez Medina, Rafael Fernando
AU - Fajardo Jaimes, Arturo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/7/4
Y1 - 2025/7/4
N2 - The present work highlights the differences between two simultaneous groups taking the electric circuit theory course. Both groups were given the same non-mandatory homework prior to the evaluation; however, the instructions provided to the groups differed. Historically, this homework has been assigned without any guidelines, and instructors have not been aware of whether students completed the task. In this study, specific instructions were developed to simulate the same stressful conditions regarding time constraints for finding the correct answer that students face during an exam. The results indicate that the group of students who received categorized exercises along with a structured schedule performed better than the non-guided group (2.8/5 versus 2.3/5 on average). The study also reveals that a significant portion of students engaged with this optional activity during the initial weeks (45%), but this engagement decreased substantially over time (to 5%), showing a correlation between evaluation results and commitment to the exercises. Sharing these findings with students may help improve performance in a course that historically has had a pass rate below 50%.
AB - The present work highlights the differences between two simultaneous groups taking the electric circuit theory course. Both groups were given the same non-mandatory homework prior to the evaluation; however, the instructions provided to the groups differed. Historically, this homework has been assigned without any guidelines, and instructors have not been aware of whether students completed the task. In this study, specific instructions were developed to simulate the same stressful conditions regarding time constraints for finding the correct answer that students face during an exam. The results indicate that the group of students who received categorized exercises along with a structured schedule performed better than the non-guided group (2.8/5 versus 2.3/5 on average). The study also reveals that a significant portion of students engaged with this optional activity during the initial weeks (45%), but this engagement decreased substantially over time (to 5%), showing a correlation between evaluation results and commitment to the exercises. Sharing these findings with students may help improve performance in a course that historically has had a pass rate below 50%.
KW - electric circuit theory
KW - exercises
KW - instructions
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011616318
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/3de06c5e-efc6-3da0-8a1e-70df79c94acc/
U2 - 10.3390/educsci15070857
DO - 10.3390/educsci15070857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011616318
SN - 2227-7102
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 16
JO - Education Sciences
JF - Education Sciences
IS - 7
M1 - 857
ER -