TY - JOUR
T1 - Clusters of sirenomelia in South America
AU - Orioli, Iêda M.
AU - Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
AU - López-Camelo, Jorge S.
AU - Saldarriaga, Wilmar
AU - Isaza, Carolina
AU - Aiello, Horacio
AU - Zarante, Ignacio
AU - Castilla, Eduardo E.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: One hospital in the city of Cali, Colombia, of the ECLAMC (Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations) network, reported the unusual occurrence of four cases of sirenomelia within a 55-day period. METHODS: An ECLAMC routine for cluster evaluation (RUMOR) was followed that included: calculations of observed/expected ratios, site visits, comparison with comprehensively collected local, South American, and worldwide data, cluster analysis, and search for risk factors. RESULTS: All four Cali sirenomelia cases were born to mothers living in a 2 km2 area, in neighboring communes, within the municipality of Cali. Considering the total births of the city of Cali as the denominator, and based on ECLAMC baseline birth prevalence rates (per 100,000) for sirenomelia (2.25, 95% CI: 2.66, 3.80), the cluster for this congenital abnormality was unlikely to have occurred by chance (observed/expected ratio = 5.77; 95% CI: 1.57-14.78; p = .002). No consistent common factor was identified, but vicinity to an open landfill as the cause could not be rejected. Another ECLAMC hospital in San Justo, Buenos Aires, Argentina, reported three further cases but these did not seem to constitute a nonrandom cluster. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology used to evaluate the two possible clusters of sirenomelia determined that the Cali sirenomelia cluster was unlikely to have occurred by chance whereas the sirenomelia cluster from San Justo seemed to be random.
AB - BACKGROUND: One hospital in the city of Cali, Colombia, of the ECLAMC (Latin-American Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations) network, reported the unusual occurrence of four cases of sirenomelia within a 55-day period. METHODS: An ECLAMC routine for cluster evaluation (RUMOR) was followed that included: calculations of observed/expected ratios, site visits, comparison with comprehensively collected local, South American, and worldwide data, cluster analysis, and search for risk factors. RESULTS: All four Cali sirenomelia cases were born to mothers living in a 2 km2 area, in neighboring communes, within the municipality of Cali. Considering the total births of the city of Cali as the denominator, and based on ECLAMC baseline birth prevalence rates (per 100,000) for sirenomelia (2.25, 95% CI: 2.66, 3.80), the cluster for this congenital abnormality was unlikely to have occurred by chance (observed/expected ratio = 5.77; 95% CI: 1.57-14.78; p = .002). No consistent common factor was identified, but vicinity to an open landfill as the cause could not be rejected. Another ECLAMC hospital in San Justo, Buenos Aires, Argentina, reported three further cases but these did not seem to constitute a nonrandom cluster. CONCLUSIONS: The methodology used to evaluate the two possible clusters of sirenomelia determined that the Cali sirenomelia cluster was unlikely to have occurred by chance whereas the sirenomelia cluster from San Justo seemed to be random.
KW - Cluster analysis
KW - Congenital abnormalities
KW - Epidemics
KW - Landfill leachate
KW - Monsters
KW - South America
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62949095977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bdra.20492
DO - 10.1002/bdra.20492
M3 - Article
C2 - 18712806
AN - SCOPUS:62949095977
SN - 1542-0752
VL - 85
SP - 112
EP - 118
JO - Birth Defects Research Part A - Clinical and Molecular Teratology
JF - Birth Defects Research Part A - Clinical and Molecular Teratology
IS - 2
ER -