TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using routine clinical and cognitive measures across multicentric underrepresented samples
T2 - A cross sectional observational study
AU - Maito, Marcelo Adrián
AU - Santamaría-García, Hernando
AU - Moguilner, Sebastián
AU - Possin, Katherine L.
AU - Godoy, María E.
AU - Avila-Funes, José Alberto
AU - Behrens, María I.
AU - Brusco, Ignacio L.
AU - Bruno, Martín A.
AU - Cardona, Juan F.
AU - Custodio, Nilton
AU - García, Adolfo M.
AU - Javandel, Shireen
AU - Lopera, Francisco
AU - Matallana, Diana L.
AU - Miller, Bruce
AU - Okada de Oliveira, Maira
AU - Pina-Escudero, Stefanie D.
AU - Slachevsky, Andrea
AU - Sosa Ortiz, Ana L.
AU - Takada, Leonel T.
AU - Tagliazuchi, Enzo
AU - Valcour, Victor
AU - Yokoyama, Jennifer S.
AU - Ibañez, Agustín
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background: Global brain health initiatives call for improving methods for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in underrepresented populations. However, diagnostic procedures in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs) and lower-middle income countries (LMICs), such as Latin American countries (LAC), face multiple challenges. These include the heterogeneity in diagnostic methods, lack of clinical harmonisation, and limited access to biomarkers. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study aimed to identify the best combination of predictors to discriminate between AD and FTD using demographic, clinical and cognitive data among 1794 participants [904 diagnosed with AD, 282 diagnosed with FTD, and 606 healthy controls (HCs)] collected in 11 clinical centres across five LAC (ReDLat cohort). Findings: A fully automated computational approach included classical statistical methods, support vector machine procedures, and machine learning techniques (random forest and sequential feature selection procedures). Results demonstrated an accurate classification of patients with AD and FTD and HCs. A machine learning model produced the best values to differentiate AD from FTD patients with an accuracy = 0.91. The top features included social cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, executive functioning performance, and cognitive screening; with secondary contributions from age, educational attainment, and sex. Interpretation: Results demonstrate that data-driven techniques applied in archival clinical datasets could enhance diagnostic procedures in regions with limited resources. These results also suggest specific fine-grained cognitive and behavioural measures may aid in the diagnosis of AD and FTD in LAC. Moreover, our results highlight an opportunity for harmonisation of clinical tools for dementia diagnosis in the region. Funding: This work was supported by the Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat), funded by NIA/ NIH ( R01AG057234), Alzheimer's Association ( SG-20-725707-ReDLat), Rainwater Foundation, Takeda ( CW2680521), Global Brain Health Institute; as well as CONICET; FONCYT-PICT ( 2017-1818, 2017-1820); PIIECC, Facultad de Humanidades, Usach; Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia ( BPIN2018000100059), Universidad del Valle ( CI 5316); ANID/ FONDECYT Regular ( 1210195, 1210176, 1210176); ANID/ FONDAP ( 15150012); ANID/ PIA/ ANILLOS ACT210096; and Alzheimer's Association GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742.
AB - Background: Global brain health initiatives call for improving methods for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in underrepresented populations. However, diagnostic procedures in upper-middle-income countries (UMICs) and lower-middle income countries (LMICs), such as Latin American countries (LAC), face multiple challenges. These include the heterogeneity in diagnostic methods, lack of clinical harmonisation, and limited access to biomarkers. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study aimed to identify the best combination of predictors to discriminate between AD and FTD using demographic, clinical and cognitive data among 1794 participants [904 diagnosed with AD, 282 diagnosed with FTD, and 606 healthy controls (HCs)] collected in 11 clinical centres across five LAC (ReDLat cohort). Findings: A fully automated computational approach included classical statistical methods, support vector machine procedures, and machine learning techniques (random forest and sequential feature selection procedures). Results demonstrated an accurate classification of patients with AD and FTD and HCs. A machine learning model produced the best values to differentiate AD from FTD patients with an accuracy = 0.91. The top features included social cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, executive functioning performance, and cognitive screening; with secondary contributions from age, educational attainment, and sex. Interpretation: Results demonstrate that data-driven techniques applied in archival clinical datasets could enhance diagnostic procedures in regions with limited resources. These results also suggest specific fine-grained cognitive and behavioural measures may aid in the diagnosis of AD and FTD in LAC. Moreover, our results highlight an opportunity for harmonisation of clinical tools for dementia diagnosis in the region. Funding: This work was supported by the Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat), funded by NIA/ NIH ( R01AG057234), Alzheimer's Association ( SG-20-725707-ReDLat), Rainwater Foundation, Takeda ( CW2680521), Global Brain Health Institute; as well as CONICET; FONCYT-PICT ( 2017-1818, 2017-1820); PIIECC, Facultad de Humanidades, Usach; Sistema General de Regalías de Colombia ( BPIN2018000100059), Universidad del Valle ( CI 5316); ANID/ FONDECYT Regular ( 1210195, 1210176, 1210176); ANID/ FONDAP ( 15150012); ANID/ PIA/ ANILLOS ACT210096; and Alzheimer's Association GBHI ALZ UK-22-865742.
KW - Alzheimer's Disease
KW - Frontotemporal dementia
KW - Machine learning
KW - Underrepresented samples
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141257058&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100387
DO - 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100387
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141257058
SN - 2667-193X
VL - 17
JO - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
JF - The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
M1 - 100387
ER -