TY - JOUR
T1 - Academia in the throes of faceless bureaucracy
AU - Pansieri, Jonathan
AU - Menassa, David
AU - Figiel, Sandy
AU - Pisa, Marco
AU - Lockhart, Andrew
AU - Ricigliano, Vito A.G.
AU - Seferoglu, Meral
AU - Borrelli, Serena
AU - Pimentel, Vitória
AU - Alpin, Nita
AU - Szejko, Natalia
AU - Samadzadeh, Sara
AU - Boldrini, Vinícius
AU - Zarco, Luis
AU - Correa-Díaz, Edgar Patricio
AU - Dos Santos Silva, Jonadab
AU - Gomez Figueroa, Enrique
AU - Carnero Contentti, Edgar
AU - Koc, Emine Rabia
AU - Dalla Costa, Gloria
AU - Casallas-Vanegas, Adriana
AU - Bakirtzis, Christos
AU - Gluscevic, Sanja
AU - Carvajal, René
AU - Tunç, Abdulkadir
AU - Haider, Lukas
PY - 2025/6/9
Y1 - 2025/6/9
N2 - What is a researcher? This is a question we have asked ourselves
many times. Perhaps you have, too. Maybe you entered academia
believing, as we did, that scientists were creators of knowledge, developing ways to better understand the world and pass that knowledge on. Maybe you still hold on to that belief. The dream of being a
researcher, a career driven by critical thinking and translating findings into tangible benefits for society, competes with a far less inspiring reality: the creeping realization that bureaucracy has
taken hold of research, slowing it down, diluting its purpose and
burying it under administrative excess. It echoes the transformation in The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, where what was once
an identity becomes something unrecognizable.
This opinion represents the views of many early-career researchers lost in the system. It reflects a reality shared by all co-authors of
this article, who come from over 15 countries across four continents,
representing different fields and institutions. Bureaucracy consumes
valuable time and intellectual energy, hindering the work we trained
for, whether that is research or delivering the best possible care to patients. Every layer of administrative oversight intensifies the challenges we face, from securing funding and publishing research to
proving professional worth in a competitive environment or simply
maintaining the motivation to keep going.
As researchers and clinicians with diverse backgrounds and cumulatively many years of experience in academia, we have witnessed how bureaucracy suffocates the scientific workforce. And
if you read these lines, we suspect you have too. The corporatization
of academia has turned bureaucracy into a self-perpetuating system, diverting research funding into administrative expansion,
and increasing the gap between oversight and scientific goals.
Eventually, it prioritizes compliance over discovery. If you are reading this as a researcher, a clinician, a policymaker or even as someone outside of science, ask yourself: is this the system we want? In
this Opinion article, we share our perspective that academia can,
and must, be reclaimed from its administrative stranglehold.
AB - What is a researcher? This is a question we have asked ourselves
many times. Perhaps you have, too. Maybe you entered academia
believing, as we did, that scientists were creators of knowledge, developing ways to better understand the world and pass that knowledge on. Maybe you still hold on to that belief. The dream of being a
researcher, a career driven by critical thinking and translating findings into tangible benefits for society, competes with a far less inspiring reality: the creeping realization that bureaucracy has
taken hold of research, slowing it down, diluting its purpose and
burying it under administrative excess. It echoes the transformation in The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka, where what was once
an identity becomes something unrecognizable.
This opinion represents the views of many early-career researchers lost in the system. It reflects a reality shared by all co-authors of
this article, who come from over 15 countries across four continents,
representing different fields and institutions. Bureaucracy consumes
valuable time and intellectual energy, hindering the work we trained
for, whether that is research or delivering the best possible care to patients. Every layer of administrative oversight intensifies the challenges we face, from securing funding and publishing research to
proving professional worth in a competitive environment or simply
maintaining the motivation to keep going.
As researchers and clinicians with diverse backgrounds and cumulatively many years of experience in academia, we have witnessed how bureaucracy suffocates the scientific workforce. And
if you read these lines, we suspect you have too. The corporatization
of academia has turned bureaucracy into a self-perpetuating system, diverting research funding into administrative expansion,
and increasing the gap between oversight and scientific goals.
Eventually, it prioritizes compliance over discovery. If you are reading this as a researcher, a clinician, a policymaker or even as someone outside of science, ask yourself: is this the system we want? In
this Opinion article, we share our perspective that academia can,
and must, be reclaimed from its administrative stranglehold.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015223698
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2f7a2062-7a97-3c50-b903-e58946a3df75/
U2 - 10.1093/brain/awaf217
DO - 10.1093/brain/awaf217
M3 - Article
C2 - 40488444
AN - SCOPUS:105015223698
SN - 0006-8950
VL - 148
SP - 3039
EP - 3042
JO - Brain
JF - Brain
IS - 9
ER -