Abstract
This article presents four interpretative repertoires that cover most of the knowledge production regarding the relationship between psychology and decoloniality. These repertoires emerged from a study aimed at establishing a state of the art that determined what we know about this relationship. Following the prescriptions that have been made to carry out this type of research that deals with "research on research" (Pulido-Martinez, Giraldo Tamayo, & Escobar Altare, 2020), articles published between 2015 and 2019 were collected and analysed. The information came from the Google Scholar, Ebscot, Sage, Elsevier, Science Direct, Scielo, and Psyinfo databases. The data was classified and hierarchized for subsequent analysis following the methodological prescriptions proposed by both Barbosa, Barbosa, and Rodríguez (2013), as well as Auyoung (2020) and McKinlay & Potter (1987).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 163-180 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Specialist publication | Annual Review of Critical Psychology |
| State | Published - 30 Jan 2024 |
Keywords
- Psychology and decoloniality
- critical psychology
- research on research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between psychology and coloniality: Interpretative repertoires'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver