Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies

James I. Watling, Victor Arroyo-Rodríguez, Marion Pfeifer, Lander Baeten, Cristina Banks-Leite, Laura M. Cisneros, Rebecca Fang, A. Caroli Hamel-Leigue, Thibault Lachat, Inara R. Leal, Luc Lens, Hugh P. Possingham, Dinarzarde C. Raheem, Danilo B. Ribeiro, Eleanor M. Slade, J. Nicolas Urbina-Cardona, Eric M. Wood, Lenore Fahrig

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

175 Scopus citations

Abstract

Decades of research suggest that species richness depends on spatial characteristics of habitat patches, especially their size and isolation. In contrast, the habitat amount hypothesis predicts that (1) species richness in plots of fixed size (species density) is more strongly and positively related to the amount of habitat around the plot than to patch size or isolation; (2) habitat amount better predicts species density than patch size and isolation combined, (3) there is no effect of habitat fragmentation per se on species density and (4) patch size and isolation effects do not become stronger with declining habitat amount. Data on eight taxonomic groups from 35 studies around the world support these predictions. Conserving species density requires minimising habitat loss, irrespective of the configuration of the patches in which that habitat is contained.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)674-681
Number of pages8
JournalEcology Letters
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Forest loss
  • habitat amount
  • patch size
  • sampling effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this