Abstract
We develop a two-sector model of physical and human capital accumulation, in which the government may allocate resources to both sectors, thereby enhancing productivity. We analyze the impact of both the level of government spending and its composition on growth and welfare, and derive their respective growth-maximizing levels. We show that both the growth-maximizing and welfare-maximizing rates of allocation of public expenditure are independent of the way infrastructures are defined (flow or stock). This conclusion, however, does not extend to the dynamics of the model where the adjustment to fiscal policy is very different. After a tax cut, for instance, the growth rate of physical and human capital converge to the new equilibrium from opposite directions under the stock specification; whereas they converge from the same direction under the flow specification.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 20160079 |
| Journal | B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- economic growth
- education
- infrastructures
- optimal tax policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stock vs flow specification of public infrastructures: A dynamic analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver