Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate

  • Maria Virginia Villegas
  • , German Esparza
  • , Jinnethe Reyes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

ESBLs are a group of plasmid-mediated, diverse, complex and rapidly evolving enzymes that pose a therapeutic challenge today in hospital-and community-acquired infections. Thirty-six years after the first report, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for ESBLs are still the subject of controversy. Detection of these enzymes is recommended for epidemiological purposes and facilitates targeted therapy, necessary for antimicrobial stewardship. On the other hand, ESBLs are not confined to specific species, phenotypic detection methods have pitfalls, and concerns exist about the accuracy of antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems to rely on MIC values for cephalosporins and b-lactam combination agents. In this issue, we present a PRO/CON debate on ESBL testing for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberdlab035
JournalJAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 Jun 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales be tested for ESBLs? A PRO/CON debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this