Screening tools for work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among workers: A rapid review of the literature

Esteban Portilla-Rojas, Laura Daniela Puche-Varón, Daniela Rivera-Guevara, Sebastián Rebolledo-Del Toro, Francisco Palencia-Sánchez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMD) is a public and occupational health problem as it increases costs, absenteeism, and productivity loss. Identifying work-related risk factors for development of WRMD through screening tools is essential to determine and preventively treat patients. The objective of this study is to synthesis and evaluate the available screening tools for WMSD in the working population.

Methods: A comprehensive rapid literature review was performed through a structured search. Inclusion criteria were: 1) screening tools for musculoskeletal disorders, 2) studies presenting analytical results such as proportion descriptions, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, and 3) articles focusing on the working population.

Results: A total of 4,584 articles were identified, with a final count of 8 articles included in the review. Screening tools identified encompassed various aspects, including work-related factors, psychosocial elements, and the working environment. This inclusive approach enables the prediction of WRMD in specific musculoskeletal sites, facilitating the categorization of workers based on their risk of developing WRMD and the necessity for medical consultation regarding their symptoms.

Conclusion: The recognition of the broader societal and industrial impact of WRMD enhances the importance of advancing screening methodologies to address this health problem.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInterdisciplinary Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Jan 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screening tools for work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among workers: A rapid review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this