Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Right on track? Performance of satellite telemetry in terrestrial wildlife research

  • M. P.G. Hofman
  • , M. W. Hayward
  • , M. Heim
  • , P. Marchand
  • , C. M. Rolandsen
  • , J. Mattisson
  • , F. Urbano
  • , M. Heurich
  • , A. Mysterud
  • , J. Melzheimer
  • , N. Morellet
  • , U. Voigt
  • , B. L. Allen
  • , B. Gehr
  • , C. Rouco
  • , W. Ullmann
  • , Holand
  • , N. H. Jørgensen
  • , G. Steinheim
  • , F. Cagnacci
  • M. Kroeschel, P. Kaczensky, B. Buuveibaatar, J. C. Payne, I. Palmegiani, K. Jerina, P. Kjellander, Johansson, S. LaPoint, R. Bayrakcismith, J. D.C. Linnell, M. Zaccaroni, M. L.S. Jorge, J. E.F. Oshima, A. Songhurst, C. Fischer, R. T. Mc Bride, J. J. Thompson, S. Streif, R. Sandfort, C. Bonenfant, M. Drouilly, M. Klapproth, D. Zinner, R. Yarnell, A. Stronza, L. Wilmott, E. Meisingset, M. Thaker, A. T. Vanak, S. Nicoloso, R. Graeber, S. Said, M. R. Boudreau, A. Devlin, R. Hoogesteijn, J. A. May-Junior, J. C. Nifong, J. Odden, H. B. Quigley, F. Tortato, D. M. Parker, A. Caso, J. Perrine, C. Tellaeche, F. Zieba, T. Zwijacz-Kozica, C. L. Appel, I. Axsom, W. T. Bean, B. Cristescu, S. Périquet, K. J. Teichman, S. Karpanty, A. Licoppe, V. Menges, K. Black, T. L. Scheppers, S. C. Schai-Braun, F. C. Azevedo, F. G. Lemos, A. Payne, L. H. Swanepoel, B. V. Weckworth, A. Berger, A. Bertassoni, G. McCulloch, P. Šustr, V. Athreya, D. Bockmuhl, J. Casaer, A. Ekori, D. Melovski, C. Richard-Hansen, D. Van De Vyver, R. Reyna-Hurtado, E. Robardet, N. Selva, A. Sergiel, M. S. Farhadinia, P. Sunde, R. Portas, H. Ambarli, R. Berzins, P. M. Kappeler, G. K. Mann, L. Pyritz, C. Bissett, T. Grant, R. Steinmetz, L. Swedell, R. J. Welch, D. Armenteras, O. R. Bidder, T. M. González, A. Rosenblatt, S. Kachel, N. Balkenhol
  • University of Göttingen
  • Bangor University
  • Nelson Mandela University
  • University of Newcastle
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage
  • Université Savoie Mont Blanc
  • University of Freiburg
  • Bavarian Forest National Park
  • University of Oslo
  • Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW) im Forschungsverbund Berlin E.V.
  • University Paul Sabatier
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
  • University of Southern Queensland
  • University of Zurich
  • CNRS
  • Manaaki Whenua - Landcare Research
  • University of Córdoba
  • University of Potsdam
  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
  • Norwegian University of Life Sciences
  • Fondazione Edmund Mach
  • Forest Research Institute of Baden-Wuerttemberg
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • University of Ljubljana
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • Snow Leopard Trust
  • Department of Migration and Immuno-ecology
  • Columbia University
  • Black Rock Forest
  • Panthera USA
  • University of Florence
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
  • Ecoexist Project
  • University of Oxford
  • Texas A and M University
  • D’Ingenierie et d’Architecture de Geneve
  • Faro Maro Ecoresearch
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología - Paraguay
  • Instituto Saite
  • Ronin Institute
  • University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
  • Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1
  • University of Cape Town
  • German Primate Center – Leibniz Institute for Primate Research
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • NSW Office of Environment and Heritage
  • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
  • Indian Institute of Science Bangalore
  • Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment
  • Wellcome Trust
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal
  • D.R.E.Am. Italia
  • Trent University
  • SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
  • Associação Onçafari
  • United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center
  • Rhodes University
  • University of Mpumalanga
  • Ministery of Environment and Natural Resources of Mexico
  • Alianza Nacional Para la Conservacion del Jaguar A.C.
  • California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
  • Universidad Nacional de Jujuy
  • Tatra National Park
  • California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt
  • Sequoia Riverlands Trust
  • Cape Leopard Trust
  • Ongava Research Centre
  • University of British Columbia
  • Virginia Tech
  • Service Public de Wallonie
  • Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Programa de Conservação Mamíferos do Cerrado (PCMC)
  • University of Venda
  • Instituto de Pesquisa e Conservação de Tamanduás no Brasil
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland
  • Macedonian Ecological Society
  • Université des Antilles
  • El Colegio de la Frontera Sur
  • ANSES Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife
  • Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Aarhus University
  • Duzce University Medical School
  • South African National Parks
  • WWF International
  • City University of New York
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • University of North Florida
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

Satellite telemetry is an increasingly utilized technology in wildlife research, and current devices can track individual animal movements at unprecedented spatial and temporal resolutions. However, as we enter the golden age of satellite telemetry, we need an in-depth understanding of the main technological, species-specific and environmental factors that determine the success and failure of satellite tracking devices across species and habitats. Here, we assess the relative influence of such factors on the ability of satellite telemetry units to provide the expected amount and quality of data by analyzing data from over 3,000 devices deployed on 62 terrestrial species in 167 projects worldwide. We evaluate the success rate in obtaining GPS fixes as well as in transferring these fixes to the user and we evaluate failure rates. Average fix success and data transfer rates were high and were generally better predicted by species and unit characteristics, while environmental characteristics influenced the variability of performance. However, 48% of the unit deployments ended prematurely, half of them due to technical failure. Nonetheless, this study shows that the performance of satellite telemetry applications has shown improvements over time, and based on our findings, we provide further recommendations for both users and manufacturers.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0216223
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Right on track? Performance of satellite telemetry in terrestrial wildlife research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this