Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

Bianca Suárez-Puerta; Inna Merkoulova

doi:10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7

Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

Bianca Suárez-Puerta
, Inna Merkoulova

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Research output: Book/Report › Book › peer-review

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to carry out
a discursive analysis of two proposals for
the opening of science, one from the
North called Open Science and the other
from the South called Flock Society or
“BuenConocer”, which is related to the new
economic matrix where the discourse on
knowledge as a good gives a different
protagonism to international scientific
communication. The corpus to be analyzed is: the
UNESCO 2021 recommendation and the open
letter and Flock Society project in 2014. The
theoretical-methodological tools include
categories from the Critical Discourse Analysis
(CDA) and the Multimedial and Multimodal
Critical Discourse Analysis (MMCDA). We start
from the hypothesis that the discourse on Open
Science is hegemonic to legitimize a publishing
monopoly. The Flock one is based on a contrary
ideology that highlightshedominant model’s
asymmetries thatonly places knowledge at the
center of production and economic circulatily

Original language	English
Publisher	GAUGN
Number of pages	486
ISBN (Print)	978-5-6048041-1-7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7
State	Published - 2020
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7

Cite this

@book{f2af80e6bb9a43bd96fccb83c9fb1929,

title = "Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes",

abstract = "The purpose of this chapter is to carry out a discursive analysis of two proposals for the opening of science, one from the North called Open Science and the other from the South called Flock Society or “BuenConocer”, which is related to the new economic matrix where the discourse on knowledge as a good gives a different protagonism to international scientific communication. The corpus to be analyzed is: the UNESCO 2021 recommendation and the open letter and Flock Society project in 2014. The theoretical-methodological tools include categories from the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and the Multimedial and Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MMCDA). We start from the hypothesis that the discourse on Open Science is hegemonic to legitimize a publishing monopoly. The Flock one is based on a contrary ideology that highlightshedominant model{\textquoteright}s asymmetries thatonly places knowledge at the center of production and economic circulatily",

author = "Bianca Su{\'a}rez-Puerta and Inna Merkoulova",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-5-6048041-1-7",

publisher = "GAUGN ",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

AU - Suárez-Puerta, Bianca

AU - Merkoulova, Inna

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The purpose of this chapter is to carry out a discursive analysis of two proposals for the opening of science, one from the North called Open Science and the other from the South called Flock Society or “BuenConocer”, which is related to the new economic matrix where the discourse on knowledge as a good gives a different protagonism to international scientific communication. The corpus to be analyzed is: the UNESCO 2021 recommendation and the open letter and Flock Society project in 2014. The theoretical-methodological tools include categories from the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and the Multimedial and Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MMCDA). We start from the hypothesis that the discourse on Open Science is hegemonic to legitimize a publishing monopoly. The Flock one is based on a contrary ideology that highlightshedominant model’s asymmetries thatonly places knowledge at the center of production and economic circulatily

AB - The purpose of this chapter is to carry out a discursive analysis of two proposals for the opening of science, one from the North called Open Science and the other from the South called Flock Society or “BuenConocer”, which is related to the new economic matrix where the discourse on knowledge as a good gives a different protagonism to international scientific communication. The corpus to be analyzed is: the UNESCO 2021 recommendation and the open letter and Flock Society project in 2014. The theoretical-methodological tools include categories from the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and the Multimedial and Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MMCDA). We start from the hypothesis that the discourse on Open Science is hegemonic to legitimize a publishing monopoly. The Flock one is based on a contrary ideology that highlightshedominant model’s asymmetries thatonly places knowledge at the center of production and economic circulatily

UR - http://ricaxcan.uaz.edu.mx/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11845/3070/1/Cap%20libro%20Visions%20onf%20the%20Opennes%20of%20science%202021%20REFLEXIONS%20IASS-AIS_.pdf

U2 - 10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7

DO - 10.18254/978-5-6048041-1-7

M3 - Book

SN - 978-5-6048041-1-7

BT - Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

PB - GAUGN

ER -

Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Miembro del comité ejecutivo de la Asociación Internacional de Estudios Semióticos

DOCTORADO EN SEMIÓTICA

POSDOCTORADO SOBRE Desarrollo Rural

Cite this

Reflections on Paths, Scenarios and Semiotic Methodology Routes

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Prizes

Miembro del comité ejecutivo de la Asociación Internacional de Estudios Semióticos

Impacts

DOCTORADO EN SEMIÓTICA

POSDOCTORADO SOBRE Desarrollo Rural

Cite this