Abstract
Based on evidence and from a policy perspective, this article discusses the Democratic Security policy. An informed debate is proposed over the conception that lies underneath the formulation of the policy, as well as the successes and shortcomings of its implementation. The article concludes that this security policy has reached the limit in terms of its positive effects and is showing structural deficiencies. From this conclusion, it follows that a reorientation of the policy is needed.
| Translated title of the contribution | ¿RE-ELECTION OF DEMOCRATIC SECURITY? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 11-39 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | CONTROVERSIA |
| Issue number | 192 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '¿RE-ELECTION OF DEMOCRATIC SECURITY?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver