Abstract
Mainstream research on the self-regulation of learning has suggest-ed practical implications for teaching based on self-regulated learning strate-gies at all educational levels, including university education, to promote ad-justment to academic challenges and students’ successful performance. For critical educational psychologists this proposal legitimizes the formation of subjectivity professed by the neoliberal discourse in education. As a psycholo-gist and researcher, who studies self-regulation of learning from mainstream psychology, I propose a critical review of the methodological approaches we use to examine self-regulation of learning to demonstrate that this subject does not necessarily legitimize neoliberal discourse in education
| Translated title of the contribution | Promoting self-regulated learners in higher education: Ne-oliberal instrument or possible didactic strategy for profes-sional training? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-28 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Teoría y Crítica de la Psicología |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 2023 |
| State | Published - 01 Aug 2023 |
Keywords
- Critical Psychology
- Neoliberalism
- Self-regulated Learning
- Teaching based on self-regulated learning
- Main Stream
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting self-regulated learners in higher education: Ne-oliberal instrument or possible didactic strategy for profes-sional training?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver