Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Primary prevention of cervical cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology resource-stratified guideline

  • Silvina Arrossi
  • , Sarah Temin
  • , Suzanne Garland
  • , Linda O.Neal Eckert
  • , Neerja Bhatla
  • , Xavier Castellsagué
  • , Sharifa Ezat Alkaff
  • , Tamika Felder
  • , Doudja Hammouda
  • , Ryo Konno
  • , Gilberto Lopes
  • , Emmanuel Mugisha
  • , Rául Murillo
  • , Isabel C. Scarinci
  • , Margaret Stanley
  • , Vivien Tsu
  • , Cosette M. Wheeler
  • , Isaac Folorunso Adewole
  • , Silvia de Sanjosé
  • Instituto Nacional del Cancer
  • American Society of Clinical Oncology
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Washington
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • Institut Català d’Oncologia
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
  • Cervivor
  • Institut National de Santé Publique
  • Jichi Medical University
  • Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • PATH
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Cambridge
  • Program for Appropriate Technology in Health (PATH)
  • University of New Mexico
  • Ministry of Public Health Lebanon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To provide resource-stratified (four tiers), evidence-based recommendations on the primary prevention of cervical cancer globally. Methods The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a multidisciplinary, multinational panel of oncology, obstetrics/gynecology, public health, cancer control, epidemiology/biostatistics, health economics, behavioral/implementation science, and patient advocacy experts. The Expert Panel reviewed existing guidelines and conducted a modified ADAPTE process and a formal consensus-based process with additional experts (consensus ratings group) for one round of formal ratings. Results Existing sets of guidelines from five guideline developers were identified and reviewed; adapted recommendations formed the evidence base. Five systematic reviews, along with cost-effectiveness analyses, provided evidence to inform the formal consensus process, which resulted in agreement of ‡ 75%. Recommendations In all resource settings, two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine are recommended for girls age 9 to 14 years, with an interval of at least 6 months and possibly up to 12 to 15 months. Individuals with HIV positivity should receive three doses. Maximal and enhanced settings: if girls are age ‡ 15 years and received their first dose before age 15 years, they may complete the series; if no doses were received before age 15 years, three doses should be administered; in both scenarios, vaccination may be through age 26 years. Limited and basic settings: if sufficient resources remain after vaccinating girls age 9 to 14 years, girls who received one dose may receive additional doses between age 15 and 26 years. Maximal, enhanced, and limited settings: if ‡ 50% coverage in the priority female target population, sufficient resources, and cost effectiveness, boys may be vaccinated to prevent other noncervical human papillomavirus–related cancers and diseases. Basic settings: vaccinating boys is not recommended. It is the view of the American Society of Clinical Oncology that health care providers and health care system decision makers should be guided by the recommendations for the highest stratum of resources available. The guideline is intended to complement but not replace local guidelines.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-634
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Global Oncology
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Primary prevention of cervical cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology resource-stratified guideline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this