Abstract
Objective. To analyze the motives for using and not using pedestrian bridges (PB). Material and Methods. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of a sample of pedestrian users and non-users of PB; a logistic regression model was used to analyze the motives for use and non-use. Results. The prevalence of non-use was 50.5 % of 813 surveyed pedestrians; the principal reason to use a PB was safety, and not to use it was "laziness". There were significant differences when analyzing the reason of non-use in the age groups 19 to 36 years, adjusted for education and physical characteristics of the PB ([aOR=1.7; 95 % CI=1.06-2.86] and [ORa.1.9; 95 % CI=1.14-3.33], respectively). Conclusions. The results of this study allow us to identify important aspects to consider -from the perspective of the pedestrians- when constructing new PB and improving existing PB to increase use in areas with a high risk of pedestrian injuries.
| Translated title of the contribution | Use and non-use of pedestrian bridges in Mexico City: The pedestrian perspective |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 502-510 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Salud Publica de Mexico |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Use and non-use of pedestrian bridges in Mexico City: The pedestrian perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver