Abstract
Background: Complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are rare, approximately 0.09% to 1.8% are duodenal perforation. This type of injury requires early diagnosis and proper management since the outcomes can be catastrophic, leading to death in 20% of cases. Objective: To show our experience in the management of these injuries in order to establish if there is benefit from minimally invasive management versus conventional management. Method: Observational, retrospective and descriptive study comparing patients who required surgical management after post-ERCP duodenal perforation in three centers in Bogotá, Colombia, between January 2013 and December 2018. Results: 13 patients were taken to surgical management after duodenal perforation post ERCP, 7 laparoscopically (53.8%), with an average hospital stay of 10.7 days and mortality of 0% and 6 by open route (46.1%), with an average hospital stay of 33 days and mortality of 50%, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Conclusions: Post ERCP duodenal perforation, despite its low incidence, should be suspected due to its high mortality. Laparoscopic surgery is a good tool to address duodenal perforations after ERCP, because it presents a lower rate of complications and mortality.
| Translated title of the contribution | Surgical management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Case series |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 611-617 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Cirugia y Cirujanos (English Edition) |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Sep 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver