Abstract
This work is a review article aiming to rebuild significant episodes for the anthropology discipline in its observation experience –through the ethnographical method– of what we call ‘power’. I argue that said experience led to an epistemological central finding for the whole group of social sciences which I coined as de-ontology of the State. I explore three examples of diversification of the ethnographic observation objects which paved the road for said de-ontology. I deny any pretension of performing a critical and comprehensive examination of the ethnographies on the State, and finally, I call to reflection on three of the conceptual-theoretical problems which have appeared from the results of the research on said ethnographies: the analysis of the myths and rituals of the State; the problem of the foundation of sovereignty; and the question around the meaning of its margins.
| Translated title of the contribution | Epistemological Contributions of Anthropological Thought on the Modern State and the Ethnographies on its Daily Practices |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 105-134 |
| Journal | Universitas humanistica |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue number | 82 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- political anthropology
- ethnographies on the State
- state sovereignty
- myths of the State
- rituals of the State
- margins of the Stateantropologia
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemological Contributions of Anthropological Thought on the Modern State and the Ethnographies on its Daily Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver