Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

La regulación de la auditoría: ¿Un factor institucional ineficaz frente a la problemática de la brecha de expectativas de auditoría?

Translated title of the contribution: Audit Regulation: An Ineffective Institutional Response to the Audit Expectation Gap?
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Audit regulation (AR) has attracted growing interest in the academic literature, primarily due to the pursuit of higher audit quality (QA) that achieves a reduction in the audit expectation gap (AEG). AEG is understood as the gap between what is expected, perceived, and what the audit can actually deliver. It is an issue that negatively impacts the reputation of the auditor and, consequently, a loss of trust in the profession. Through a systematic literature review, this paper analyzes 72 articles and identifies the audit regulation topics that have been the focus of academic research in recent years (2019–2024). The results indicate that audit regulation has focused on: improving audit quality; strengthening auditor inspection and oversight processes; mitigating the risk of litigation and potential legal liabilities for auditors; and improving aspects such as independence and audit fees. Despite this, these aspects of AR are ineffective in addressing the issue of the AEG.
Translated title of the contributionAudit Regulation: An Ineffective Institutional Response to the Audit Expectation Gap?
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
JournalCUADERNOS DE CONTABILIDAD
Volume26
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Aug 2025

Keywords

  • M42-Auditing
  • M48-Government Policy and Regulation
  • Audit Regulation
  • Audit Expectation Gap (AEG)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Audit Regulation: An Ineffective Institutional Response to the Audit Expectation Gap?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this