Abstract
This paper studies the first two questions of John Duns Scotus’s Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge. In these questions, Scotus es-tablishes the scientific character of logic against the Aristotelian objection which defines logic as method of science. And, against the Aristotelian definition of a scientific object as a determined genre, Scotus establishes logic as a common science. The Spanish traduction of these two questions is presented as appendix.
| Translated title of the contribution | The determination of logic as intentional common science in Duns Scotus |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 51-86 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Franciscanum |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue number | 165 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Duns Scotus
- Robert Kilwardby
- medieval logic
- history of logic
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The determination of logic as intentional common science in Duns Scotus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver