Abstract
The remake that we have started of phenomenology since the Phenomenological Meditations (1992) has led us here to reexamine the question of transcendental aperception and
transcendental cogito such as it is known by Husserl. The problematic of phenomenalization
and phenomenological schematism of phaenomena as but phaenomena leads to its
decomposition in three architectonical registers, whose common structure is each time
that of a discordance into the accordance: register of off language with, its instable proto-temporalization, register of language with its temporalizations in presence without a present
that could be set, and utterly husserlian register of intentional meanings which temporalize
themselves in presents. In this context, the question of the Stiftung itself of eidetic husserlian a priori is examined.
transcendental cogito such as it is known by Husserl. The problematic of phenomenalization
and phenomenological schematism of phaenomena as but phaenomena leads to its
decomposition in three architectonical registers, whose common structure is each time
that of a discordance into the accordance: register of off language with, its instable proto-temporalization, register of language with its temporalizations in presence without a present
that could be set, and utterly husserlian register of intentional meanings which temporalize
themselves in presents. In this context, the question of the Stiftung itself of eidetic husserlian a priori is examined.
| Translated title of the contribution | The immediate transcendental apperception and its decomposition in phenomenology |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 319-370 |
| Number of pages | 51 |
| Journal | Eikasía Revista de Filosofía |
| Issue number | 115 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 03 Jul 2023 |
Keywords
- Phaenomenon
- Phenomenalization
- Pulsing
- Stiftung
- Schematism
- Ideality