Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Judicial reform

  • Juan Carlos Botero
  • , Rafael La Porta
  • , Florencio López-de-Silanes
  • , Andrei Shleifer
  • , Alexander Volokh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

A review of the evidence on judicial reform across countries shows that those seeking to improve economic performance should not focus on judicial efficiency alone but on independence as well. It also shows that the level of resources poured into the judicial system and the accessibility of the system have little impact on judicial performance. Most of the problem of judicial stagnation stems from inadequate incentives and overly complicated procedures. Incentive-oriented reforms that seek to increase accountability, competition, and choice seem to be the most effective in tackling the problem. But incentives alone do not correct systematic judicial failure. Chronic judicial stagnation calls for simplifying procedures and increasing their flexibility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)61-88
Number of pages28
JournalWorld Bank Research Observer
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this