Abstract
Objective: This paper aims to assess cases where it is necessary to include uncertainties in decision-making input data. Materials and Methods: Three case studies with different numbers of alternatives and different numbers and natures of criteria were evaluated. The CRIDE tool [39] was used to include uncertainties in the input data. Results and Discussion: The results obtained showed that for more difficult decision-making problems, the inclusion of variations in input data could change the final decision, while for less challenging problems, it is unnecessary to take uncertainties into account. Conclusions: These findings could be useful for decision-makers in obtaining more accurate results or in saving time and money related to input data acquisition.
| Translated title of the contribution | Incluyendo incertidumbres en la toma de decisiones multi-criterio: ¿una tarea superflua o un requerimiento? |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-25 |
| Journal | Ingenieria y Universidad |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2019 |
Keywords
- Multicriteria decision-making
- Robustness
- Sensitivity and redundancy analysis
- Uncertainties
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Including uncertainties in multi-criteria decision-making: A superfluous task or a requirement?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver