Abstract
This study examines the relationship between ambiguity and the ideological positioning of political parties across the political spectrum. We identify a strong non-monotonic (inverted U-shaped) relationship between party ideology and ambiguity within a sample of 202 European political parties. This pattern is observed across all ideological dimensions covered in the data. To explain this pattern, we argue that centrist parties are perceived as less risky by voters compared to extremist parties, giving them an advantage in employing ambiguity to attract more voters at a lower cost. We support our explanation with additional evidence from electoral outcomes and economic indicators in the respective party countries.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-180 |
| Number of pages | 42 |
| Journal | Economics of Governance |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Ambiguity
- Centrism
- D72
- Extremism
- Political parties
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ideological ambiguity and political spectrum'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver