Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

HER2-low prevalence among Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Daniel Felipe Mendivelso-González
  • , Daniel Clavijo Cabezas
  • , Luisa Montoya
  • , Merideidy Plazas Vargas
  • , Patricia López-Correa
  • , Eugenia Colón
  • , Rafael Parra-Medina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose HER2-low has garnered significant attention for the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. We aimed to determine the prevalence of HER2-low expression in Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer (BC). Methods We searched in Embase, LILACS, and Medline databases for articles reporting the expression of HER2 immunohistochemistry with scores reported as 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+, with equivocal cases (2+) confirmed through in situ hybridization (ISH). Results A total of 12 articles were finally included, comprising 73,467 individuals. The prevalence of HER2-zero, HER2-low and HER2 positive cases among all BC (0, 1+, 2+/ISH-, 2+/ISH+ and 3+), was 45.0%, 32.0%, and 23.0%, respectively. The prevalence of HER2-zero and HER2-low expression among negative cases (0, 1+ and 2+/ISH-), was 53.0% and 47.0%, respectively. Conclusion There is an important percentage of Hispanic/Latino individuals who would benefit from HER2-targeted therapies, even in HER2 negative cases. Additional research on the prevalence of HER2-low tumors across a wider range of Latin American countries is required to better understand the molecular epidemiology of this biomarker within the Hispanic/Latino population.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0315287
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume19
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'HER2-low prevalence among Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this