Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genetic variation in the immunosuppression pathway genes and breast cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 42,510 cases and 40,577 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium

  • Jieping Lei
  • , Anja Rudolph
  • , Kirsten B. Moysich
  • , Sabine Behrens
  • , Ellen L. Goode
  • , Manjeet K. Bolla
  • , Joe Dennis
  • , Alison M. Dunning
  • , Douglas F. Easton
  • , Qin Wang
  • , Javier Benitez
  • , John L. Hopper
  • , Melissa C. Southey
  • , Marjanka K. Schmidt
  • , Annegien Broeks
  • , Peter A. Fasching
  • , Lothar Haeberle
  • , Julian Peto
  • , Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
  • , Elinor J. Sawyer
  • Ian Tomlinson, Barbara Burwinkel, Frederik Marmé, Pascal Guénel, Thérèse Truong, Stig E. Bojesen, Henrik Flyger, Sune F. Nielsen, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Anna González-Neira, Primitiva Menéndez, Hoda Anton-Culver, Susan L. Neuhausen, Hermann Brenner, Volker Arndt, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, Hiltrud Brauch, Ute Hamann, Heli Nevanlinna, Rainer Fagerholm, Thilo Dörk, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Arto Mannermaa, Jaana M. Hartikainen, Ovarian Study Group Australian Ovarian Study Group, Investigators kConFab Investigators, Laurien Van Dijck, Ann Smeets, Dieter Flesch-Janys, Ursula Eilber, Paolo Radice, Paolo Peterlongo, Fergus J. Couch, Emily Hallberg, Graham G. Giles, Roger L. Milne, Christopher A. Haiman, Fredrick Schumacher, Jacques Simard, Mark S. Goldberg, Vessela Kristensen, Anne Lise Borresen-Dale, Wei Zheng, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Robert Winqvist, Mervi Grip, Irene L. Andrulis, Gord Glendon, Montserrat García-Closas, Jonine Figueroa, Kamila Czene, Judith S. Brand, Hatef Darabi, Mikael Eriksson, Per Hall, Jingmei Li, Angela Cox, Simon S. Cross, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Mitul Shah, Maria Kabisch, Diana Torres, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Foluso Ademuyiwa, Christine B. Ambrosone, Anthony Swerdlow, Michael Jones, Jenny Chang-Claude
  • German Cancer Research Center
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Cambridge
  • Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras
  • Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare Diseases (CIBERER)
  • Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
  • University of Melbourne
  • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
  • Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
  • Guy’s Hospital
  • University of Oxford
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Occupational and Social Determinants of Health
  • APHP – Paris Saclay University
  • Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Hospital Monte Naranco
  • University of California, Irvine
  • Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Cologne
  • Robert Bosch Foundation
  • University of Tübingen
  • Helsinki University Hospital
  • Hannover Medical School
  • University of Eastern Finland
  • Queensland Institute of Medical Research
  • Peter Maccallum Cancer Centre
  • KU Leuven
  • University Hospitals Leuven
  • University of Hamburg
  • IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale per lo studio e la cura dei tumori - Milano
  • FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology
  • Cancer Council Victoria
  • Keck School of Medicine of USC
  • Université Laval
  • McGill University
  • McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital
  • Oslo University Hospital-Radiumhospitalet
  • University of Oslo
  • Oslo University Hospital
  • Vanderbilt University
  • University of Oulu
  • Central Finland Health Care District
  • Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute
  • University of Toronto
  • Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Sheffield
  • Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Immunosuppression plays a pivotal role in assisting tumors to evade immune destruction and promoting tumor development. We hypothesized that genetic variation in the immunosuppression pathway genes may be implicated in breast cancer tumorigenesis. We included 42,510 female breast cancer cases and 40,577 controls of European ancestry from 37 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (2015) with available genotype data for 3595 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 133 candidate genes. Associations between genotyped SNPs and overall breast cancer risk, and secondarily according to estrogen receptor (ER) status, were assessed using multiple logistic regression models. Gene-level associations were assessed based on principal component analysis. Gene expression analyses were conducted using RNA sequencing level 3 data from The Cancer Genome Atlas for 989 breast tumor samples and 113 matched normal tissue samples. SNP rs1905339 (A>G) in the STAT3 region was associated with an increased breast cancer risk (per allele odds ratio 1.05, 95 % confidence interval 1.03–1.08; p value = 1.4 × 10−6). The association did not differ significantly by ER status. On the gene level, in addition to TGFBR2 and CCND1, IL5 and GM-CSF showed the strongest associations with overall breast cancer risk (p value = 1.0 × 10−3 and 7.0 × 10−3, respectively). Furthermore, STAT3 and IL5 but not GM-CSF were differentially expressed between breast tumor tissue and normal tissue (p value = 2.5 × 10−3, 4.5 × 10−4 and 0.63, respectively). Our data provide evidence that the immunosuppression pathway genes STAT3,IL5, and GM-CSF may be novel susceptibility loci for breast cancer in women of European ancestry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-154
Number of pages18
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume135
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 Jan 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genetic variation in the immunosuppression pathway genes and breast cancer susceptibility: a pooled analysis of 42,510 cases and 40,577 controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this