Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Formaciones actuales de lo campesino en américa latina: Conceptualizaciones, sujetos/as políticos/as y territorios en disputa *

Translated title of the contribution: Current peasant formations in latin america: Conceptualizations, political subjects, and territories in dispute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the centrality in the study of the peasantry in Latin America, for various disciplines, this category is still bound to static images of a group defined according to the State and capital. In this article, we explain the need to study the situated reality — historically, geographically and politically — of the individuals and groups that fit into this category of the peasantry. The issue concerning peasants is a pressing one in view of the current economic, political and socio-environmental crisis affecting large sectors of the Latin American population. This crisis is due, among other dynamics, to the advance of extractivism, the exacerbation of inequality, environmental deterioration, the dispossession of marginalized communities, and criminalization of the social movement. In order to further the critical analysis of this issue, from a historical, spatial, relational, and political perspective, we will delve into recent conceptualizations of the peasant, and into how political subjects and spatialities are mutually constructed.

Translated title of the contributionCurrent peasant formations in latin america: Conceptualizations, political subjects, and territories in dispute
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)3-25
Number of pages23
JournalAntipoda
Volume2020
Issue number40
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current peasant formations in latin america: Conceptualizations, political subjects, and territories in dispute'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this