Abstract
The text strives to clarify the meaning of the naturalistic fallacy and the Hume's law, departing from the traditional understanding according to which it would not be possible to derive an ought from an is, nor an evaluative judgment from a descriptive one. The reflections close analyzing the performance capacity of the naturalist fallacy and Hume's law in criminal law. In particular, showing how they are used as a strategy to cover up the radically political nature of legislation.
| Translated title of the contribution | Naturalistic fallacy and Hume's law: Its meaning in criminal law |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 49-72 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Revista Chilena de Derecho |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Naturalistic fallacy and Hume's law: Its meaning in criminal law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver