Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention: The case of an embarrassing product

  • Juan Carlos Londono
  • , Keri Davies
  • , Jonathan Elms
  • Stirling Management School
  • Massey University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is successful in predicting consumer intentions for a wide variety of products and behaviors. However, little is known about how effective the TPB is when the behavior under study is embarrassing. To this end, this paper extends the TPB to create a conceptual model to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention. An empirical study was conducted whereby the model was tested using survey data on the purchase of Regaine (a hair loss product that is embarrassing to buy) in Boots (a well-known UK multichannel drugstore). The embarrassing nature of Regaine created differences in the importance that emotions played when consumers intend to purchase using face-to-face channels (such as the physical drugstore) as against multichannel options or the internet. The results were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). The effectiveness of the TPB was improved. The variance explained (R2 to intention) was 0.44% for the total sample, 49% for the drugstore, 58.4% for the internet, and 42.5% for multichannel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-20
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Volume36
DOIs
StatePublished - 01 May 2017

Keywords

  • Anticipated negative emotions
  • Embarrassing products
  • Multichannel
  • Single-channel
  • Theory of Planned Behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine the role of anticipated negative emotions on channel intention: The case of an embarrassing product'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this